fix(scorer): require hard signals for likely-test - #3
Conversation
ℹ️ Recent review info⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: defaults Review profile: CHILL Plan: Free Run ID: 📒 Files selected for processing (10)
📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughThis PR refactors the organization labeler's scoring system to distinguish "hard test signals" (evidence that forces the likely-test tier) from "softer validation notes" (data-quality issues shown to operators without changing tier). Constants, authenticity evaluation, scorer integration, HF classifier, tests, and documentation are updated to implement the new two-signal model. ChangesScoring and Tiering Logic Refactor
🎯 3 (Moderate) | ⏱️ ~25 minutes
Note 🎁 Summarized by CodeRabbit FreeYour organization is on the Free plan. CodeRabbit will generate a high-level summary and a walkthrough for each pull request. For a comprehensive line-by-line review, please upgrade your subscription to CodeRabbit Pro by visiting https://app.coderabbit.ai/login. Comment |
|



Summary
likely-testsignal-based instead of low-score-basedTEST_PDS_HOSTSas hard likely-test evidencetest,testing, andtestedin profile descriptionsValidation
npm testnpm run buildNotes
Summary by CodeRabbit
Documentation
Behavior Updates