Schema: hyperpolymath/standards TRUSTED-BASE-REDUCTION-POLICY.adoc (standards#203).
The 2026-05-26 estate proof-debt audit (standards#195) detected 129 soundness-relevant escape hatches in this repo. This file is the initial seed — every marker starts in §(d) DEBT and the maintainer triages each into §(a) / §(b) / §(c) / §(d) as classification proceeds.
(None yet — entries move here when the proof lands or the construct is removed.)
(None yet — entries belong here when the construct is at an extraction boundary and is covered by a documented property-test budget.)
(None yet — entries belong here when the construct encodes a metatheoretic assumption that cannot be discharged within the working logic.)
All 129 markers below start in this section. As the maintainer classifies each, it should be moved into §(a) / §(b) / §(c) as appropriate. Markers that genuinely belong in §(d) need a deadline and an owner.
(no markers; check-trusted-base passes already)
If
129> 30, the list above shows the first 30 only. The full list is reproducible via:bash /path/to/standards/scripts/check-trusted-base.sh .
- Run
scripts/check-trusted-base.shlocally; it lists every marker with file:line. - For each marker, decide:
- Can this be proven? → §(a) DISCHARGED via a PR that adds the proof.
- Is this at an FFI / extraction / opaque-primitive boundary? → §(b) or §(c). Add a property test and document the refutation budget for §(b), or cite the metatheoretic justification for §(c).
- Is this temporary debt? → §(d) with a deadline.
- Update this file in the same PR that lands the disposition.
- The
check-trusted-baseCI job (standards#211) ensures markers are never un-annotated AND un-enumerated simultaneously.
- standards#195 — estate proof-debt audit.
- standards#203 — trusted-base reduction policy (the schema this file follows).
- standards#211 —
check-trusted-base.shCI enforcement.
🤖 Initial seed by Claude Code, 2026-05-26.