|
| 1 | +// SPDX-License-Identifier: MPL-2.0 |
| 2 | +// SPDX-FileCopyrightText: 2026 Jonathan D.A. Jewell (hyperpolymath) |
| 3 | += Proof debt |
| 4 | +:policy: https://github.com/hyperpolymath/standards/blob/main/docs/TRUSTED-BASE-REDUCTION-POLICY.adoc |
| 5 | +:tapl: TAPL (Pierce 2002) Chapter 6 |
| 6 | +:discharge-pr: https://github.com/hyperpolymath/betlang/pull/27 |
| 7 | + |
| 8 | +Per link:{policy}[standards#203] (trusted-base reduction policy), every |
| 9 | +soundness-relevant escape hatch in this repo is classified below as one |
| 10 | +of: (a) DISCHARGED, (b) BUDGETED, (c) NECESSARY AXIOM, or (d) DEBT. |
| 11 | + |
| 12 | +Supersedes the thin index in |
| 13 | +https://github.com/hyperpolymath/betlang/pull/37[betlang#37] (which |
| 14 | +declared "3 escape hatches" — the actual count is 1). |
| 15 | + |
| 16 | +== Marker count |
| 17 | + |
| 18 | +1 soundness-relevant escape hatch in this repo: |
| 19 | + |
| 20 | +* `proofs/BetLang.lean:392` — `axiom substTop_preserves_typing` |
| 21 | + |
| 22 | +Zero `sorry` declarations. Zero `noncomputable` in soundness positions. |
| 23 | + |
| 24 | +== (a) Discharged |
| 25 | + |
| 26 | +No entries. |
| 27 | + |
| 28 | +== (b) Budgeted — tested with refutation budget |
| 29 | + |
| 30 | +No entries. |
| 31 | + |
| 32 | +== (c) NECESSARY AXIOM |
| 33 | + |
| 34 | +=== `proofs/BetLang.lean:392` — `axiom substTop_preserves_typing` |
| 35 | + |
| 36 | +[source,lean] |
| 37 | +---- |
| 38 | +axiom substTop_preserves_typing : |
| 39 | + ∀ (Γ : Ctx) (S T : Ty) (body v : Expr), |
| 40 | + HasType (S :: Γ) body T → HasType Γ v S → HasType Γ (substTop v body) T |
| 41 | +---- |
| 42 | + |
| 43 | +* **Kind**: classical substitution lemma for typed lambda terms under |
| 44 | + de Bruijn substitution. |
| 45 | +* **Justification**: discharging requires the full shifting / |
| 46 | + substitution calculus over de Bruijn indices, which would triple |
| 47 | + the file size and is orthogonal to the BetLang-specific content of |
| 48 | + this formalisation. The property is standard and well-known to |
| 49 | + hold for this style of substitution. |
| 50 | +* **Citation**: {tapl} ("Pure Simply Typed Lambda Calculus" — the |
| 51 | + substitution lemma is the canonical preservation prerequisite). |
| 52 | + Mechanised independently in many libraries: Software Foundations |
| 53 | + Volume 2 § STLC, Programming Language Foundations in Agda § |
| 54 | + Properties, Lean Mathlib's `Mathlib.Logic.Function.Iterate` |
| 55 | + substitution machinery. |
| 56 | +* **Used by**: `preservation` theorem at `proofs/BetLang.lean:398` |
| 57 | + (invoked in the `appLam` case to thread typing across |
| 58 | + beta-reduction). |
| 59 | +* **Author's framing**: the in-file comment at |
| 60 | + `proofs/BetLang.lean:387-391` is explicit that this is an axiom, |
| 61 | + not a `sorry`: _"IMPORTANT: This is NOT sorry — it is an axiom. |
| 62 | + The difference is that axioms are explicit assumptions in the |
| 63 | + logical framework, whereas sorry is a proof hole."_ |
| 64 | +* **Promotion path** (optional, not blocking): see |
| 65 | + link:{discharge-pr}[betlang PR #27] body for a discharge recipe. |
| 66 | + Promotion would move this entry to §(a) DISCHARGED and remove the |
| 67 | + `axiom` declaration in favour of a proof using the Lean Mathlib |
| 68 | + substitution lemmas. |
| 69 | + |
| 70 | +== (d) DEBT — actively to be closed |
| 71 | + |
| 72 | +No entries. (If the promotion path above is pursued, the §(c) entry |
| 73 | +moves to §(a); it does not pass through §(d) because it has a |
| 74 | +principled disposition today.) |
| 75 | + |
| 76 | +== Cross-references |
| 77 | + |
| 78 | +* link:{policy}[standards#203] — trusted-base reduction policy |
| 79 | + (canonical estate-wide definition) |
| 80 | +* `proofs/BetLang.lean` — the formal model where the axiom is |
| 81 | + declared and used |
| 82 | +* `docs/semantics.md` — language semantics overview |
| 83 | +* link:{discharge-pr}[betlang PR #27] — discharge recipe (optional |
| 84 | + promotion to §(a)) |
0 commit comments