Skip to content

docs(claude-md): flip ReScript→AffineScript per 2026-05-25 estate lan…#40

Merged
hyperpolymath merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
docs/claude-md-rescript-to-affinescript
Jun 23, 2026
Merged

docs(claude-md): flip ReScript→AffineScript per 2026-05-25 estate lan…#40
hyperpolymath merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
docs/claude-md-rescript-to-affinescript

Conversation

@hyperpolymath

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

…guage policy

Per the 2026-05-25 estate language policy (TypeScript/ReScript → AffineScript, tracked at hyperpolymath/standards#252), the .claude/CLAUDE.md language-policy section here names ReScript as the primary application language and as the TypeScript replacement. Flip both to AffineScript.

Substitutions applied:

  • ALLOWED row: ReScript → AffineScript (with target-platform note)
  • JavaScript-fallback note: ReScript → AffineScript
  • BANNED replacement row: TypeScript→ReScript → TypeScript→AffineScript
  • Tauri web-UI: ReScript → AffineScript
  • Enforcement rule: "Convert existing TS to ReScript" → AffineScript
  • Enforcement rule: "ReScript for apps" → AffineScript for apps

Docs-only change. Refs hyperpolymath/standards#287 (CLAUDE.md docs slice umbrella) and hyperpolymath/standards#252 (parent ReScript→AffineScript migration tracker).

Summary

Closes #

Type of change

  • 🐛 Bug fix (non-breaking change that fixes an issue)
  • ✨ New feature (non-breaking change that adds functionality)
  • 💥 Breaking change (would change existing behaviour)
  • 🕳️ Soundness fix (fixes a checker/proof false-negative)
  • 📖 Documentation
  • 🧹 Refactor / tech debt (behaviour-preserving)
  • ⚡ Performance
  • 🔧 Build / CI / tooling

How has this been verified?

Checklist

  • My commits are signed (git commit -S).
  • I ran the project's own checks/tests locally and they pass.
  • New files carry the correct SPDX-License-Identifier (code/config MPL-2.0,
    prose CC-BY-SA-4.0); I did not relicense existing files.
  • Docs are updated, and no public claim now overstates what the code does.
  • I have not introduced a soundness hole (or I have flagged where I might have).

Notes for reviewers

hyperpolymath and others added 2 commits May 30, 2026 14:57
…guage policy

Per the 2026-05-25 estate language policy (TypeScript/ReScript → AffineScript,
tracked at hyperpolymath/standards#252), the .claude/CLAUDE.md language-policy
section here names ReScript as the primary application language and as the
TypeScript replacement. Flip both to AffineScript.

Substitutions applied:
- ALLOWED row: ReScript → AffineScript (with target-platform note)
- JavaScript-fallback note: ReScript → AffineScript
- BANNED replacement row: TypeScript→ReScript → TypeScript→AffineScript
- Tauri web-UI: ReScript → AffineScript
- Enforcement rule: "Convert existing TS to ReScript" → AffineScript
- Enforcement rule: "ReScript for apps" → AffineScript for apps

Docs-only change. Refs hyperpolymath/standards#287 (CLAUDE.md docs slice
umbrella) and hyperpolymath/standards#252 (parent ReScript→AffineScript
migration tracker).

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
@hyperpolymath
hyperpolymath merged commit c9d6b29 into main Jun 23, 2026
@hyperpolymath
hyperpolymath deleted the docs/claude-md-rescript-to-affinescript branch June 23, 2026 15:57
@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Dependency Review

✅ No vulnerabilities or license issues or OpenSSF Scorecard issues found.

Scanned Files

None

hyperpolymath added a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 24, 2026
## What

The salvageable result of fully integrating **#41**
(`estate-standardization-20260607`) onto current `main`. I did the full
3-way merge as requested (option c); the **definitive finding** is that
#41 is ~fully superseded:

> A faithful integration of #41 onto current `main` nets to **exactly
these 4 issue templates (195 insertions)** — every other file in #41's
70-file diff is already on `main` (your parallel estate-standardization
in #37#40 + our recent work landed it all), and its
`.machine_readable/6a2/*.a2ml` changes were **regressive** (main renamed
`6a2/ → descriptiles/`).

So this PR carries the one piece worth keeping, cleanly off `main`:

- `bug_report.md`, `feature_request.md` — #41's clean classic templates,
as-is.
- `question.yml`, `documentation.yml` — **#41 had these malformed**
(classic markdown front-matter stacked on top of raw issue-forms YAML
inside a single `.md`, which GitHub renders as literal text). Fixed into
proper `.yml` issue forms, preserving the (good) forms schema.

## Recommendation

**Close #41 as superseded** once this lands — merging #41 itself would
regress `main` (resurrect `6a2/`, re-add the retired
`scorecard-enforcer.yml`, revert the README). This PR is the salvage.

Note: `main` currently lacks issue templates (they existed in #41's
merge base but not on current `main`). If they were removed
deliberately, just close this too — no harm done.

🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code)

https://claude.ai/code/session_01WN6nPWWe4dvXfoqBG6auWN

---
_Generated by [Claude
Code](https://claude.ai/code/session_01WN6nPWWe4dvXfoqBG6auWN)_

Co-authored-by: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
@hyperpolymath hyperpolymath mentioned this pull request Jun 24, 2026
13 tasks
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant