Two layers: the identity-claim gates (the falsifiable conditions the project
must keep meeting) and the live open work per track. Authoritative sources:
roadmap-gates.adoc and CLAUDE.md current-rung-state.
The identity claim rests on three gates. Each has an explicit failure action;
failure is recorded in docs/retractions.adoc, not silently revised. Gates are
reassessed at each tagged release — surviving one round does not grant immunity
in the next.
| Gate | Condition | Failure action |
|---|---|---|
1. Distinct phenomenon |
Echo types name structured loss under non-injective computation as distinct
from refinement types, lens/optic theory, HoTT fibers, setoid quotients,
provenance semirings. Carried by the truncation argument ( |
Drop identity claim; retain as Agda exposition. |
2. Characteristic theorems |
At least two theorems are naturally echo-shaped and not reducible to generic
Σ lemmas. Current nominees: |
Drop claim of a distinct theorem family; modules remain. |
3. Canonical examples |
At least one fully worked example where echo types are the right explanatory unit (preferable to, not merely compatible with, existing framings). |
Reframe as theoretical scaffolding awaiting application. |
|
Note
|
The integration recipe across the five decoration axes does not carry
the Gate 1 distinctness load — that was established (negatively) by EI-2 and is
terminated. Do not reopen it under any reframing in
.machine_readable/6a2/STATE.a2ml § forbidden-rebrandings.
|
The base accumulation iso, cancellation iso, and pentagon coherence are all
landed and packaged as ↔. No open headline items; further work is
consolidation / doc-threading.
Target: Bachmann–Howard ψ₀(Ω_ω). Open, in priority order:
-
Unbudgeted
<ᵇʳᶠglobal WF — the GLOBAL form over native<ᵇis walled (all five standard routes; native<ᵇis ordinally unsound — seebuchholz-rank-obstruction.adoc). The SOUND-CARRIER form is DONE (2026-06-14, PR #212):RecursiveSurfaceSound.wf-<ᵇʳᶠ²is unbudgeted, built over<ᵇ²+ the doubled-ladderrank2embedding. Remaining open is only the global-over-native form, whose realistic close-out is a falsifiable "cannot close under `--safe --without-K`" verdict rather than a positive proof. -
Full constructor set beyond the admitted core — the K-limited shared-binder cases
<ᵇ-ψα,<ᵇ-+2. -
Push the surface-route WF back into
Order.agda’s main `<ᵇpackage.
Pillars A–D and F (F1–F4) are closed. All four paper.adoc [EXPAND]
tags are cleared, the last (ordinal consumer-evidence appendix) on
2026-06-14 — written at the well-foundedness milestone, with
order-type fidelity recorded as a named OPEN problem
(decision-log D-2026-06-14), NOT claimed. The in-repo half of
Pillar E is complete at the bounded-claim level. Remaining:
-
Order-type fidelity (the named open problem
D-2026-06-14): a verified order-preserving denotationBT → 𝒪of height ψ₀(Ω_ω), or a direct order-type computation. The genuine remaining ordinal-strength frontier; no current module establishes it. -
Then, author-driven and not auto-run: Zenodo DOI, installable library packaging, outreach. Flag to the user; do not start unprompted.
The full debt list, with effort/impact, lives in
.machine_readable/agent_instructions/debt.a2ml. Highlights:
-
Should: the two ordinal WF items above; image factorisation (epi, mono) earn-back (needs propositional truncation — a substantial design decision).
-
Could: decoration-zoo wiring (Cost/Search/Indexed/Epistemic as ResidueForm/DecorationStructure instances); the Q2.1 truncation generalisation; rsr-conformance chores (@sha256 pins, README/roadmap de-duplication, doc-format migration); the JanusKey 4→8-variant enum mirror.
-
Recipe extension (coupled state across axes): v0.2+, not EI-2 follow-up. File as EI-3 when v0.2 work begins.
-
Full 2D iff for recipe-non-triviality: not formalisable in safe Agda without postulates; PATH B (partial formalisation) accepted.
| Outcome | Action |
|---|---|
All three gates pass |
Identity claim upheld; proceed to peer review. |
Any gate fails |
Identity claim retracted in README + on Zenodo (new version, revised abstract). Modules remain; the claim does not. |
|
Tip
|
Retractions are not failures of the repository. They are the mechanism by which the identity claim is made falsifiable in the first place. |