Commit 30dc931
committed
proof(ordinal): doubled-ladder rank
Builds the doubled-ladder rank on top of the Slice-1 foundation and
lands the actual equal-Ω boundary discharge — the case the single
ω-power ladder could not close.
Key simplification: the doubled ladder is just the EXISTING
`ω-rank-pow` / `ω-rank-pow-succ` on a DOUBLED OmegaIndex. With
`double (fin n) = fin (n + n)`, `double ω = ω`:
ω-rank-pow (double (fin n)) = ω^(suc (n+n)) = ω^(2n+1) -- ψ-block
ω-rank-pow-succ (double (fin n)) = ω^(suc (suc (n+n))) = ω^(2n+2) -- Ω-block
both DEFINITIONALLY. So the whole Brouwer machinery (additive-
principal closure, the room fact `ω-rank-pow-⊕-below-succ`, strict-
mono) transfers to the doubled ladder for free by instantiating its
index at `double ν`.
Lands:
* `double : OmegaIndex → OmegaIndex`
* `rank2 : BT → Ord` (bzero→oz, bOmega ν→ω-rank-pow-succ (double ν),
bpsi ν α→ω-rank-pow (double ν) ⊕ rank2 α, bplus→⊕)
* `rank2-{bzero,bOmega,bpsi,bplus}` definitional sanity
* `rank2-bpsi-below-bOmega` — THE equal-Ω discharge:
rank2 α <′ ω-rank-pow (double ν)
→ rank2 (bpsi ν α) <′ rank2 (bOmega ν)
proved as `ω-rank-pow-⊕-below-succ {double ν}` — covering the fin
AND the limit (ω) marker, since that lemma is total over
OmegaIndex. This is exactly the boundary rank-pow (collapses
ψ_ν/Ω_ν) and rank-adm (ranks ψ ABOVE Ω) could not discharge.
Honest scope: Slice 2 lands the rank + the equal-Ω discharge under a
rank2-level admissibility hypothesis. Follow-on slices: the WfAdm
bridge supplying that hypothesis; the cross-index `<ᵇ-Ωψ` discharge
(consumes Slice-1's `Ω-block-below-next-ψ` + its ω-marker analogue);
the remaining per-constructor rank-mono; the wf-<′ transport.
- `rank2`, `rank2-bpsi-below-bOmega` pinned in `Ordinal/Buchholz/Smoke.agda`.
- `Smoke.agda` + `All.agda` exit 0 under `--safe --without-K`; zero
postulates, no escape pragmas, no funext.
https://claude.ai/code/session_017t53M7W7ubmXpwymveLcCErank2 + equal-Ω discharge (Slice 2)1 parent 1cd486a commit 30dc931
2 files changed
Lines changed: 78 additions & 2 deletions
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change | |
|---|---|---|---|
| |||
76 | 76 | | |
77 | 77 | | |
78 | 78 | | |
79 | | - | |
| 79 | + | |
80 | 80 | | |
81 | | - | |
| 81 | + | |
82 | 82 | | |
83 | 83 | | |
84 | 84 | | |
| |||
92 | 92 | | |
93 | 93 | | |
94 | 94 | | |
| 95 | + | |
| 96 | + | |
| 97 | + | |
| 98 | + | |
95 | 99 | | |
96 | 100 | | |
97 | 101 | | |
| |||
160 | 164 | | |
161 | 165 | | |
162 | 166 | | |
| 167 | + | |
| 168 | + | |
| 169 | + | |
| 170 | + | |
| 171 | + | |
| 172 | + | |
| 173 | + | |
| 174 | + | |
| 175 | + | |
| 176 | + | |
| 177 | + | |
| 178 | + | |
| 179 | + | |
| 180 | + | |
| 181 | + | |
| 182 | + | |
| 183 | + | |
| 184 | + | |
| 185 | + | |
| 186 | + | |
| 187 | + | |
| 188 | + | |
| 189 | + | |
| 190 | + | |
| 191 | + | |
| 192 | + | |
| 193 | + | |
| 194 | + | |
| 195 | + | |
| 196 | + | |
| 197 | + | |
| 198 | + | |
| 199 | + | |
| 200 | + | |
| 201 | + | |
| 202 | + | |
| 203 | + | |
| 204 | + | |
| 205 | + | |
| 206 | + | |
| 207 | + | |
| 208 | + | |
| 209 | + | |
| 210 | + | |
| 211 | + | |
| 212 | + | |
| 213 | + | |
| 214 | + | |
| 215 | + | |
| 216 | + | |
| 217 | + | |
| 218 | + | |
| 219 | + | |
| 220 | + | |
| 221 | + | |
| 222 | + | |
| 223 | + | |
| 224 | + | |
| 225 | + | |
| 226 | + | |
| 227 | + | |
| 228 | + | |
| 229 | + | |
| 230 | + | |
| 231 | + | |
| 232 | + | |
| 233 | + | |
| 234 | + | |
| 235 | + | |
| 236 | + | |
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change | |
|---|---|---|---|
| |||
469 | 469 | | |
470 | 470 | | |
471 | 471 | | |
| 472 | + | |
| 473 | + | |
472 | 474 | | |
473 | 475 | | |
474 | 476 | | |
| |||
0 commit comments