|
| 1 | +# Audit Report — verisimdb-data (2026-04-04) |
| 2 | + |
| 3 | +## Summary |
| 4 | + |
| 5 | +VeriSimDB Data is a Git-backed flat-file storage repository for scan results and drift detection data. The codebase functions as a data lake/index for other projects' security audit results. It exhibits strong RSR compliance with comprehensive CI/CD automation. This is a data repository, not a runtime codebase, so dangerous pattern concerns are minimal and primarily confined to recipe documentation. |
| 6 | + |
| 7 | +## Findings |
| 8 | + |
| 9 | +### Critical |
| 10 | + |
| 11 | +None identified. This is a data aggregation repo with no runtime execution code. |
| 12 | + |
| 13 | +### High |
| 14 | + |
| 15 | +- **Dangerous pattern references in recipes/registry.json** — Documentation-only references to believe_me, unsafePerformIO, unsafeCoerce patterns from upstream projects |
| 16 | +- These are SCAN RESULTS (not actual code) — patterns documented in registry.json are findings from audited projects |
| 17 | + |
| 18 | +### Medium |
| 19 | + |
| 20 | +- Recipe documentation is comprehensive but only examples/guidance (not executed) |
| 21 | +- Test coverage limited to ingest workflows |
| 22 | +- Drift detection data is time-series snapshots |
| 23 | + |
| 24 | +## RSR Compliance |
| 25 | + |
| 26 | +- **EXPLAINME.adoc**: present ✓ |
| 27 | +- **0-AI-MANIFEST.a2ml**: present ✓ |
| 28 | +- **.machine_readable/**: present ✓ |
| 29 | +- **SECURITY.md**: present ✓ |
| 30 | +- **CONTRIBUTING.md**: present ✓ |
| 31 | + |
| 32 | +## Test Coverage |
| 33 | + |
| 34 | +VeriSimDB-data has minimal active test code (it's a data repo), but includes: |
| 35 | + |
| 36 | +- **Workflow validation**: ingest.yml (GitHub Actions triggered on workflow_dispatch) |
| 37 | +- **Data schema validation**: JSON validation in ingest workflow |
| 38 | +- **Index consistency**: jekyll.yml, jekyll-gh-pages.yml for documentation builds |
| 39 | +- **CI workflows**: 17 quality, security, and policy enforcement workflows |
| 40 | + |
| 41 | +Test coverage is appropriate for a data repository: |
| 42 | +- recipes/ — Refactoring recipes (documentation, not executable) |
| 43 | +- patterns/registry.json — Scan result index (data, not code) |
| 44 | +- scans/ — Historical scan snapshots (data artifacts) |
| 45 | +- drift/ — Drift detection records (time-series data) |
| 46 | + |
| 47 | +## Proof Debt |
| 48 | + |
| 49 | +**Status: N/A FOR DATA REPO** |
| 50 | + |
| 51 | +This is a **data aggregation repository**, not a proof-bearing codebase. Dangerous patterns found in registry.json are: |
| 52 | + |
| 53 | +1. **Scan result documentation** (from audited upstream repos): |
| 54 | + - 14 believe_me instances in src/Proven/SafeEmail/Proofs.idr (remote project) |
| 55 | + - 18 believe_me instances in src/Proven/SafeJWT/Proofs.idr (remote project) |
| 56 | + - 6 believe_me instances in src/abi/Layout.idr (remote project) |
| 57 | + - ... (total 87 indexed patterns across 10+ projects) |
| 58 | + |
| 59 | +2. **Recipes** (documentation/guidance): |
| 60 | + - recipe-remove-believe-me.json — How to eliminate believe_me |
| 61 | + - recipe-unsafe-type-coercion.json — How to eliminate unsafe casts |
| 62 | + - These are **guidance documents**, not actual code violations |
| 63 | + |
| 64 | +**Conclusion**: VeriSimDB-data correctly stores and documents dangerous patterns found in OTHER projects' codebase scans. This is the intended use case. |
| 65 | + |
| 66 | +## Publication Safety |
| 67 | + |
| 68 | +**Claim**: "Data aggregation repository for security audit results" |
| 69 | + |
| 70 | +**Evidence**: |
| 71 | +- registry.json documents patterns from scanned repositories |
| 72 | +- scans/ contains JSON results from panic-attack and other tools |
| 73 | +- Recipes provide remediation guidance (best practices) |
| 74 | +- Index is machine-readable for downstream tool consumption |
| 75 | + |
| 76 | +This is appropriate. The repo transparently documents findings from external audits. |
| 77 | + |
| 78 | +## CI Health |
| 79 | + |
| 80 | +**Status: COMPREHENSIVE** |
| 81 | + |
| 82 | +Active workflows (17 files): |
| 83 | +- ingest.yml — Data ingestion trigger |
| 84 | +- mirror.yml — Git repository mirroring |
| 85 | +- codeql.yml, security-policy.yml — Security scanning |
| 86 | +- quality.yml — Code quality |
| 87 | +- rsr-antipattern.yml — RSR policy enforcement |
| 88 | +- npm-bun-blocker.yml, ts-blocker.yml, guix-nix-policy.yml — Language/tool enforcement |
| 89 | +- scorecard.yml, secret-scanner.yml — Supply chain security |
| 90 | +- jekyll.yml, jekyll-gh-pages.yml — Documentation |
| 91 | +- workflow-linter.yml, wellknown-enforcement.yml — Standards compliance |
| 92 | +- instant-sync.yml — Mirroring |
| 93 | + |
| 94 | +**No failures detected**. All workflows properly configured. |
| 95 | + |
| 96 | +## Verdict |
| 97 | + |
| 98 | +**PUBLISHABLE NOW** |
| 99 | + |
| 100 | +VeriSimDB-data is functioning as intended: a transparent data lake documenting security findings across the estate. The dangerous patterns found in registry.json are **correctly** documented as findings from OTHER projects' scans—not code defects in this repo itself. |
| 101 | + |
| 102 | +Publication is appropriate because: |
| 103 | +1. Data aggregation is the intended use case |
| 104 | +2. Scan results are transparently documented |
| 105 | +3. Remediation recipes are provided |
| 106 | +4. Complete RSR compliance |
| 107 | +5. Comprehensive CI enforcement |
| 108 | + |
| 109 | +The fact that dangerous patterns appear in scans is NOT a defect—it's evidence that the audit pipeline is working correctly. |
| 110 | + |
| 111 | +--- |
| 112 | + |
| 113 | +**Audited by**: M2 estate audit (2026-04-04) |
| 114 | +**Confidence**: HIGH |
| 115 | +**Recommendation**: SHIP AS-IS |
0 commit comments