Commit 1f3b337
RDMA/core: Fix rereg_mr use-after-free race
When a driver creates a new MR during rereg_user_mr, a race window
exists between rdma_alloc_commit_uobject() for the new MR and the point
where the code reads that MR to populate the response keys.
A concurrent rereg_mr or destroy_mr could destroy the MR in this window
and cause UAF in the first thread.
Racing flow between two rereg_mr calls:
CPU0 CPU1
---- ----
rereg_user_mr(mr_handle)
uobj_get_write(mr_handle) -> mr0
mr1 = driver→rereg()
rdma_alloc_commit_uobject(mr1)
// mr1 replaced mr0 and is unlocked
uobj_put_destroy(mr0)
rereg_user_mr(mr_handle)
uobj_get_write(mr_handle) -> mr1
mr2 = driver→rereg()
rdma_alloc_commit_uobject(mr2)
// mr2 replaced mr1 and is unlocked
uobj_put_destroy(mr1)
// Destroys mr1!
resp.lkey = mr1->lkey; // UAF - mr1 was freed!
resp.rkey = mr1->rkey; // UAF - mr1 was freed!
Fix by storing lkey/rkey in local variables before the new MR is
unlocked and using the local variables to set the user response.
Fixes: 6e0954b ("RDMA/uverbs: Allow drivers to create a new HW object during rereg_mr")
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/r/20260427-security-bug-fixes-v3-4-4621fa52de0e@nvidia.com
Signed-off-by: Michael Guralnik <michaelgur@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Maher Sanalla <msanalla@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Edward Srouji <edwards@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>1 parent 610771c commit 1f3b337
1 file changed
Lines changed: 7 additions & 2 deletions
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change | |
|---|---|---|---|
| |||
778 | 778 | | |
779 | 779 | | |
780 | 780 | | |
| 781 | + | |
781 | 782 | | |
782 | 783 | | |
783 | 784 | | |
| |||
846 | 847 | | |
847 | 848 | | |
848 | 849 | | |
| 850 | + | |
| 851 | + | |
849 | 852 | | |
850 | 853 | | |
851 | 854 | | |
| |||
871 | 874 | | |
872 | 875 | | |
873 | 876 | | |
| 877 | + | |
| 878 | + | |
874 | 879 | | |
875 | 880 | | |
876 | 881 | | |
877 | | - | |
878 | | - | |
| 882 | + | |
| 883 | + | |
879 | 884 | | |
880 | 885 | | |
881 | 886 | | |
| |||
0 commit comments