Skip to content

Commit 73562c5

Browse files
Update snr_star.md
1 parent 3622294 commit 73562c5

1 file changed

Lines changed: 15 additions & 14 deletions

File tree

_pages/plugins/snr_star.md

Lines changed: 15 additions & 14 deletions
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -8,7 +8,7 @@ doi: 10.6009/jjrt.2022-1154
88

99
**Author:** Motohiro TABUCHI
1010

11-
SNR_star is an ImageJ macro that estimates signal variance and noise variance using the covariance between two repeated images acquired under identical imaging conditions.
11+
SNR_star is an ImageJ macro that estimates signal and noise variance using the covariance between two repeated images acquired under identical imaging conditions.
1212
It provides an unbiased and statistically optimal estimation of signal-to-noise ratio (SNR).
1313

1414
The method is particularly useful for image quality evaluation in X-ray CT where direct measurement of signal variance is difficult.
@@ -58,15 +58,15 @@ SNR* [dB] = 10 log10 (σ_s² / σ_n²)
5858
![Usage](./snr_star_usage.jpg)
5959

6060
1. Prepare a folder containing two observed images
61-
2. Open the first image in ImageJ
62-
3. Draw a region of interest (ROI)
63-
4. Run the SNR_star macro
64-
5. The macro outputs the following values in the Log window:
61+
2. Run the SNR_star macro and select the folder containing the two observed images
62+
3. Open the first image in ImageJ
63+
4. Draw a region of interest (ROI)
64+
5. Results appear in the Log window:
6565

66-
* SNR* [dB]
67-
* ROI size
68-
* signal variance
69-
* noise variance
66+
- SNR* [dB]
67+
- ROI size
68+
- signal variance
69+
- noise variance
7070

7171
---
7272

@@ -90,12 +90,13 @@ https://zenodo.org/record/18666471
9090

9191
---
9292

93-
## Notes
93+
### Notes
9494

95-
* The method assumes additive, zero-mean, independent noise between the two images
96-
* Larger ROIs improve estimation stability
97-
* Negative covariance may indicate unsuitable imaging conditions
98-
* The method is applicable to CT and other imaging modalities with repeated acquisitions
95+
- Requires two repeated images acquired under identical imaging conditions
96+
- Assumes additive, zero-mean, independent noise between the two images
97+
- The ROI should be selected with an appropriate shape and size to represent the signal of interest
98+
- Inclusion of large uniform background regions may reduce the estimated SNR*
99+
- The method is applicable to CT, MRI, and other imaging modalities with repeated acquisitions
99100

100101
---
101102

0 commit comments

Comments
 (0)