Test ExaModels AOT Compilation

[pulsipher]

This tests out the ExaModels changes proposed in exanauts/ExaModels.jl#256.

[codecov-commenter]

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 90.00000% with 4 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
✅ Project coverage is 85.16%. Comparing base (64c85bb) to head (70359bb).

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
src/transform.jl	90.00%	4 Missing ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main      #31      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   85.09%   85.16%   +0.07%     
==========================================
  Files           6        6              
  Lines         711      708       -3     
==========================================
- Hits          605      603       -2     
+ Misses        106      105       -1     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

[pulsipher]

This appears to make very little difference for performance and allocations/memory. Using the quadrotor example from our benchmarks with 1000 time points, I get the following with the current release:

using NLPModelsIpopt, InfiniteOpt, InfiniteExaModels

m = quad(num_supports = 1000, backend = ExaTranscriptionBackend(IpoptSolver))
set_silent(m)
@time build_transcription_backend!(m) # builds the ExaModel
@time optimize!(m)

0.168895 seconds (450.06 k allocations: 24.030 MiB)
0.865922 seconds (310 allocations: 2.626 MiB)

With this PR, I get:

0.174419 seconds (449.24 k allocations: 24.468 MiB)
0.856932 seconds (310 allocations: 2.629 MiB)