I was just looking at rescoring the deposited RMF files and while the EM scores look reasonably close to what's in the stat files, the cross correlation coefficients seem low (around 0.2). @Pellarin , is this to be expected for Mediator?
e.g. if I rescore the top ranking model for the first cluster, i.e. analysis/clustering/kmeans_weight_500_4/cluster.0/0.rmf3
... I get for the middle module an EM score of 181.99 and a CCC of 0.22, and for the tail an EM score of 217.13 and CCC of 0.17. The stat file contains 'GaussianEMRestraint_None': ' 211.99099168'. No label was assigned, so that must be the tail EM score, and my value is within 2% so I'm confident the coordinates are correct.
@cgreenberg, for CCC I'm reporting what you call cc in the code here:
https://github.com/salilab/imp/blob/develop/modules/isd/src/GaussianEMRestraint.cpp#L203
Maybe I did something dumb and that's not really the cross correlation?
I was just looking at rescoring the deposited RMF files and while the EM scores look reasonably close to what's in the stat files, the cross correlation coefficients seem low (around 0.2). @Pellarin , is this to be expected for Mediator?
e.g. if I rescore the top ranking model for the first cluster, i.e.
analysis/clustering/kmeans_weight_500_4/cluster.0/0.rmf3... I get for the middle module an EM score of 181.99 and a CCC of 0.22, and for the tail an EM score of 217.13 and CCC of 0.17. The stat file contains
'GaussianEMRestraint_None': ' 211.99099168'. No label was assigned, so that must be the tail EM score, and my value is within 2% so I'm confident the coordinates are correct.@cgreenberg, for CCC I'm reporting what you call
ccin the code here:https://github.com/salilab/imp/blob/develop/modules/isd/src/GaussianEMRestraint.cpp#L203
Maybe I did something dumb and that's not really the cross correlation?