Int64 support for UpsampleNearest3d#3737
Conversation
Co-authored-by: Slawomir Siwek <slawomir.siwek@intel.com>
|
3 runs with 20 execs per test case each
The benchmark shows that for stable test cases dispatch based approach is faster by around 5%. For small kernels results were mostly noise and varied greatly. |
|
@copilot please review the changes in depth |
I've reviewed the changes in depth. Here's my assessment: Overall approach: The PR correctly implements an int32/int64 index dispatch pattern using Key changes reviewed:
One minor observation: The No blocking issues found — the implementation is correct and well-aligned with the upstream CUDA approach. |
|
/merge -f "unrelated CI failure" |
|
✅ PR has been successfully merged by @kdrozd-dev (force merge). |
Fixes: intel#2510. Align with changes from: pytorch/pytorch#144865. Improve error messages to resemble the cuda ones and change the relevant int32 variables to int64. --------- Co-authored-by: Slawomir Siwek <slawomir.siwek@intel.com>
Fixes: #2510.
Align with changes from: pytorch/pytorch#144865. Improve error messages to resemble the cuda ones and change the relevant int32 variables to int64.