Skip to content

Potential fix for code scanning alert no. 5: Insecure randomness#7

Merged
jonathansantilli merged 3 commits into
mainfrom
alert-autofix-5
Mar 7, 2026
Merged

Potential fix for code scanning alert no. 5: Insecure randomness#7
jonathansantilli merged 3 commits into
mainfrom
alert-autofix-5

Conversation

@jonathansantilli
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Potential fix for https://github.com/jonathansantilli/codegate/security/code-scanning/5

In general, to fix this kind of issue you should avoid Math.random() for any value that is treated as an identifier, token, or anything that could be relied on for uniqueness or secrecy, and instead use a cryptographically secure random generator such as crypto.randomBytes (Node) or crypto.getRandomValues (browser). This ensures the generated value is not trivially predictable and has sufficient entropy.

For this specific file, the best fix is to replace the nonce generation inside sessionIdFromNow() to use randomBytes from Node’s crypto module, and to add the corresponding import. We can generate a short hexadecimal string with randomBytes(3).toString("hex"), which yields 6 hex characters like the current slice(2, 8) call, so existing formats remain essentially unchanged. Concretely:

  • Update the import line to include randomBytes from "node:crypto".
  • Change line 72 from Math.random().toString(16).slice(2, 8); to a call to randomBytes(3).toString("hex");.
    No other logic needs to change, so functionality is preserved aside from stronger randomness.

Suggested fixes powered by Copilot Autofix. Review carefully before merging.

jonathansantilli and others added 2 commits March 7, 2026 19:32
Co-authored-by: Copilot Autofix powered by AI <62310815+github-advanced-security[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
@jonathansantilli jonathansantilli marked this pull request as ready for review March 7, 2026 19:48
@jonathansantilli jonathansantilli merged commit e98b73c into main Mar 7, 2026
14 checks passed
@jonathansantilli jonathansantilli deleted the alert-autofix-5 branch March 7, 2026 20:04
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant