Skip to content

Commit aa2c6ea

Browse files
committed
chore(archive): perform canonical audit on Wave 5 (6 interviews)
1 parent 5f9d4c3 commit aa2c6ea

19 files changed

Lines changed: 4538 additions & 950 deletions

_data/transcripts/david-heinemeier-hansson-dhh-railsconf-2014.yml

Lines changed: 0 additions & 310 deletions
Large diffs are not rendered by default.

_data/transcripts/evan-phoenix-creator-of-rubinius-ruby-vm-puma-app-se-railsconf-2014.yml

Lines changed: 268 additions & 611 deletions
Large diffs are not rendered by default.
Lines changed: 2 additions & 0 deletions
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,2 @@
1+
---
2+
content: "*music*"
Lines changed: 91 additions & 0 deletions
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,91 @@
1+
---
2+
content: |-
3+
user groups with lots to say interviews and more no way sharing great ideas in
4+
the tech community fascinating conversations a plethora of information
5+
find out for yourself today at uktastic.com hi it's Mike with uktastic
6+
I'm here at SCNA 2013 right now I'm sitting down with Angelique Martin who
7+
is the lead organizer for SCNA and you've been doing this for a couple
8+
years now but well first I know you're really busy so I appreciate you taking
9+
that time to sit down with me but so 2013 you've been doing this for a few
10+
years what if what has it that you've learned over the last couple years that
11+
has affected 2013 and how is 2013 maybe different than what you did in 2012 well
12+
the differences were actually pretty subtle the the main concept of the
13+
short talk with the long breaks for networking remained what we did this
14+
year is that we try to change the schedule a little bit so that the second
15+
day would start a little bit later so we could have a code and coffee session so
16+
as to allow for more technical time we've reintroduced the 5k that we had
17+
three years ago this is actually a Siena's fifth year and we used to go back
18+
and forth now it's been a scene a site has been organizing it for I would say
19+
the best three years and then one year before so this is really the fourth time
20+
that we do this so the the big picture stays the same and is really terrible
21+
that's the world but the idea is to well hopefully reiterate the conference and
22+
make it well I think it was really terrible I was like I said well that's
23+
like to reiterate yeah no no no it is it is a word at least for the sake of this
24+
conversation we will say the reiterate is work no it is and but I but as far as
25+
kind of the joke they're really terrible hey there's a lot that goes into these
26+
these conferences that people might not realize oh absolutely the the big
27+
challenge this year was to get our speakers right even though we had
28+
announced our conference dates last year at the end of the conference we had a
29+
conflict with another major event with which we were competing for our speakers
30+
so we had a lot of speakers that couldn't make it the other room down in
31+
the rubric comes down and some other event in Chicago no fluff just stuff no
32+
function stuff but luckily we were still able to you know have 13 wonderful
33+
speakers and devote a total session to lightning talks and a panel which
34+
featured four of our speakers we try to put a certain dose of entertainment so
35+
we had a couple of kettus and jeopardy game and some other events that we do
36+
and I think having the introductions by different people absolutely so so
37+
between sessions when a new speaker was coming up it wouldn't always be the same
38+
person introducing the speaker and there was one little snag as there always is in
39+
any anything more one of the speakers had gotten locked outside right and but
40+
because of having you know a person up there that was comfortable they could
41+
talk and kind of control the room a little bit and right we
42+
had a bunch of software jokes and it was winged pretty well and Gary made it
43+
just what three four minutes late yeah okay we were a little bit on our side as
44+
well but that's that's what shows a strong organization is being able to be
45+
resilient through those kinds of hurdles absolutely and but also other things
46+
that about just like the cost and expensive of doing a conference I
47+
remember our conversation you and I had before where you mentioned that
48+
previous years I don't know if it's last year or the year before water bottles
49+
were ridiculous ridiculously expensive yeah aside the main cost for the
50+
conference is really food beverages and the venue we've detached ourselves from
51+
the hotel because a few years ago we had an experience but right there's consumption costs that are
52+
not necessarily yeah so when you take a ball when you take a bottle of water keep
53+
it because it might be really expensive and it might affect whether or not
54+
there's gonna be a conference again next year right and we're always looking for
55+
sponsors I mean I want to really say clearly that events like this could not
56+
be produced if it wasn't for the help of the sponsors so that we can I don't know
57+
if you've noticed but SC&E's price is the same that we've had for for as long
58+
as I remember putting the conference together
59+
and it's getting to be a stretch it's going to be difficult to maintain that
60+
low price with and then competing for sponsors because they're also looking at
61+
okay if I if they're a ruby company or they provide ruby services they're gonna
62+
already be pre-allocating for a direct ruby conference and now you're
63+
competing for those dollars just because you cover a broad spectrum anything that
64+
if somebody was looking at
65+
how they could maybe look at starting their own conference in an area what are
66+
do you have any other little tidbits you might think of that if somebody's
67+
looking at a conference that they might want to just think about before they get
68+
into it what are you know you mentioned costs and sponsors but right I think the
69+
the biggest part is the venue I found the best couple of years we've had this
70+
venue which is by the way fantastic but it's not a
71+
hotel venue so we we are able to limit the cost and limit the liability because
72+
when you do book a conference in a hotel depending on where you do it at least
73+
that's the experience in Chicago they have some sort of ratio of hotel rooms
74+
to meeting space but with the technology nowadays it's not uncommon for people to
75+
find really cheap rate elsewhere leaving you with a liability for hotel rooms that are
76+
actually not right because they don't seem to be giving you an optimal rates
77+
they're they're charging sticker price and yeah yeah I definitely can say that I
78+
am personally myself when I go to a conference I'm looking at hipmunk you
79+
know and it's you know it's I would love to support the conference but sometimes
80+
it's just the rates are so high that it's right almost prohibitive to even like go
81+
as an attendee right exactly so that's why by not by not having a hotel venue
82+
we're able to leave the choice to the people as to what tools they want to do
83+
right what they want to use to find the accommodation rates that so much like we
84+
were trying to write our good software we decouple things I know you're not a
85+
software person but
86+
so but anyway I know you're very busy and I'm catching you around the middle I
87+
appreciate you taking the time to sit down thank you very much thank you user
88+
groups with lots to say interviews and more no way sharing great ideas in the
89+
tech community fascinating conversations a plethora of information find out for
90+
yourself today at ucdastic.com
91+
you

0 commit comments

Comments
 (0)