Stop jhr XHR function from swallowing JSON.parse error#31
Open
silasdavis wants to merge 1 commit into
Open
Conversation
Signed-off-by: Silas Davis <silas@monax.io>
2bbbd7f to
74aec52
Compare
Member
|
I think it's a legacy issue in PhantomJS. The console logger isn't as capable. Speaking of PhantomJS issues -- the expected error is different, too:
|
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There are a number of circumstances where the server may return a non-empty non-JSON response:
In these cases
jhrdies silently and so the front end cannot easily display an error message. This change wraps the JSON parsing in a function with a try catch and returns an appropriate error.I have an issue with the tests - the pass successfully in the browser (by loading runner.html) but they fail with
yarn testwhich complains withFailed assertion: expected: [object Object], but was: [object Object]. This is different to failure in the browser UI that gives you a nice string diff between the objects. it seems like gulp-qunit is ending up with a different broken implementation ofdeepEqual. I tried upgradinggulp-qunitandqunitbut it didn't help. Perhaps you have an idea how to fix, otherwise we can work around it some other way. It's odd because I don't see the difference between the other usages that work fine.