Fix PyPI badge rendering

[koxudaxi]

No description provided.

[coderabbitai]

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

PyPI version badge URLs are updated from badge.fury.io to img.shields.io in both the README and documentation index, maintaining the same target URLs.

Badge URL Updates

Layer / File(s)	Summary
Badge URL Updates README.md, docs/index.md	PyPI version badge image sources switched from badge.fury.io to img.shields.io endpoints while preserving the link destinations to PyPI packages.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~2 minutes

Possibly related PRs

• koxudaxi/datamodel-code-generator#3052: Both PRs update README/docs badge URLs using img.shields.io for the PyPI/download badge, applying the same documentation link endpoint change.

Poem

🐰 A badge, a link, a simple swap,
From fury's glow to shields' bright top,
Two docs align, now shiny and new,
PyPI's version shines right through! ✨

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 5

✅ Passed checks (5 passed)

Check name	Status	Explanation
Description Check	✅ Passed	Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Docstring Coverage	✅ Passed	No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.
Linked Issues check	✅ Passed	Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Out of Scope Changes check	✅ Passed	Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Title check	✅ Passed	The title 'Fix PyPI badge rendering' directly addresses the main change in the changeset: updating PyPI version badges in README.md and docs/index.md from badge.fury.io to img.shields.io.

_{✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings.}

✨ Finishing Touches

📝 Generate docstrings

• Create stacked PR
• Commit on current branch

🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)

• Create PR with unit tests
• Commit unit tests in branch fix-docs-initial-render

---

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.}

[codspeed-hq]

Merging this PR will improve performance by 44.5%

⚠️ Unknown Walltime execution environment detected

Using the Walltime instrument on standard Hosted Runners will lead to inconsistent data.

For the most accurate results, we recommend using CodSpeed Macro Runners: bare-metal machines fine-tuned for performance measurement consistency.

⚠️ Different runtime environments detected

Some benchmarks with significant performance changes were compared across different runtime environments,
which may affect the accuracy of the results.

Open the report in CodSpeed to investigate

⚡ 11 improved benchmarks
⏩ 98 skipped benchmarks¹

Performance Changes

	Mode	Benchmark	BASE	HEAD	Efficiency
⚡	WallTime	test_perf_all_options_enabled	6.3 s	4.2 s	+47.95%
⚡	WallTime	test_perf_aws_style_openapi_pydantic_v2	2.1 s	1.4 s	+47.69%
⚡	WallTime	test_perf_deep_nested	5.8 s	3.9 s	+47.67%
⚡	WallTime	test_perf_large_models_pydantic_v2	3.9 s	2.7 s	+46.94%
⚡	WallTime	test_perf_kubernetes_style_pydantic_v2	2.8 s	1.9 s	+44.5%
⚡	WallTime	test_perf_duplicate_names	1,094.3 ms	762 ms	+43.61%
⚡	WallTime	test_perf_stripe_style_pydantic_v2	2.2 s	1.5 s	+43.36%
⚡	WallTime	test_perf_openapi_large	3.1 s	2.2 s	+42.45%
⚡	WallTime	test_perf_multiple_files_input	3.8 s	2.7 s	+42.36%
⚡	WallTime	test_perf_complex_refs	2.2 s	1.5 s	+42.06%
⚡	WallTime	test_perf_graphql_style_pydantic_v2	860 ms	609.5 ms	+41.09%

Tip

Curious why this is faster? Comment @codspeedbot explain why this is faster on this PR, or directly use the CodSpeed MCP with your agent.

---

_{Comparing fix-docs-initial-render (cfcd915) with main (70ae43f)}

Footnotes

1. 98 benchmarks were skipped, so the baseline results were used instead. If they were deleted from the codebase, click here and archive them to remove them from the performance reports. ↩

[github-actions]

📚 Docs Preview: https://pr-3247.datamodel-code-generator.pages.dev

[codecov]

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 100.00%. Comparing base (70ae43f) to head (cfcd915).

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##              main     #3247   +/-   ##
=========================================
  Coverage   100.00%   100.00%           
=========================================
  Files          112       112           
  Lines        25192     25192           
  Branches      3182      3182           
=========================================
  Hits         25192     25192           

Flag	Coverage Δ
unittests	100.00% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Harness.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

[github-actions]

Breaking Change Analysis

Result: No breaking changes detected

Reasoning: PR #3247 only modifies documentation files: a badge URL migration in README.md/docs/index.md/docs/llms-full.txt, and a JavaScript/CSS fix in the MkDocs theme override (overrides/main.html) to resolve an initial render issue on the docs site. No changes to code generation output, Jinja2 templates, CLI/API interfaces, default behavior, Python version support, or error handling.

---

This analysis was performed by Claude Code Action

[github-actions]

🎉 Released in 0.60.0

This PR is now available in the latest release. See the release notes for details.