Document Docker image and action usage

[koxudaxi]

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Documentation
  • Updated Docker usage guidance to note that published images run as a non-root user and to help ensure bind-mounted output directories are writable.
  • Refreshed CI/CD examples across the docs to use the latest recommended GitHub Action version.
  • Updated version-pinning tips and workflow snippets to match the newer release.

[coderabbitai]

No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉

ℹ️ Recent review info

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

Run ID: 6ea297b7-6e86-4168-a277-d8f8ba185460

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between a437c7d and d39a794.

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)

• docs/llms-full.txt is excluded by none and included by none

📒 Files selected for processing (3)

• README.md
• docs/ci-cd.md
• docs/index.md

---

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

Documentation updates pin the koxudaxi/datamodel-code-generator GitHub Action reference from version 0.44.0 to 0.66.3 across README.md, docs/ci-cd.md, and docs/index.md workflow examples. README.md additionally adds guidance about the Docker image running as a non-root appuser and writable bind-mount directories.

Changes

Documentation updates

Layer / File(s)	Summary
Docker non-root user guidance README.md	Adds a note explaining the container runs as non-root appuser and advises ensuring writable bind-mounted output directories or passing an explicit --user.
GitHub Action version pin updates README.md, docs/ci-cd.md, docs/index.md	Updates all pinned koxudaxi/datamodel-code-generator action version references from @0.44.0 to @0.66.3 across README and CI/CD documentation workflow examples.

Estimated code review effort: 1 (Trivial) | ~5 minutes

Possibly related PRs

• koxudaxi/datamodel-code-generator#2683: Overlaps on GitHub Actions CI/CD docs (docs/ci-cd.md, docs/index.md) presenting the datamodel-code-generator workflow usage and versioning.
• koxudaxi/datamodel-code-generator#3538: Directly aligns with README's Docker non-root appuser guidance introduced in this PR.

Poem
A rabbit hopped through docs today,
Bumped version tags from old to new,
Non-root appuser, safe and true,
Bind mounts writable, permissions fine,
Hop, hop, hooray — the docs align!

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 5

✅ Passed checks (5 passed)

Check name	Status	Explanation
Description Check	✅ Passed	Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title check	✅ Passed	The title accurately summarizes the main documentation updates for Docker image guidance and GitHub Action usage examples.
Docstring Coverage	✅ Passed	No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.
Linked Issues check	✅ Passed	Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Out of Scope Changes check	✅ Passed	Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.

✨ Finishing Touches

🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)

• Create PR with unit tests
• Commit unit tests in branch docs/docker-action-followups

---

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.}

[github-actions]

📚 Docs Preview: https://pr-3544.datamodel-code-generator.pages.dev

[codspeed-hq]

Merging this PR will not alter performance

⚠️ Unknown Walltime execution environment detected

Using the Walltime instrument on standard Hosted Runners will lead to inconsistent data.

For the most accurate results, we recommend using CodSpeed Macro Runners: bare-metal machines fine-tuned for performance measurement consistency.

✅ 11 untouched benchmarks
⏩ 98 skipped benchmarks¹

---

_{Comparing docs/docker-action-followups (d39a794) with main (a437c7d)}

Footnotes

1. 98 benchmarks were skipped, so the baseline results were used instead. If they were deleted from the codebase, click here and archive them to remove them from the performance reports. ↩

[codecov]

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 100.00%. Comparing base (a437c7d) to head (d39a794).

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##              main     #3544   +/-   ##
=========================================
  Coverage   100.00%   100.00%           
=========================================
  Files          161       161           
  Lines        34363     34363           
  Branches      4011      4011           
=========================================
  Hits         34363     34363           

Flag	Coverage Δ
unittests	100.00% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Harness.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

[github-actions]

Breaking Change Analysis

Result: No breaking changes detected

Reasoning: PR #3544 is documentation-only. It modifies README.md, docs/ci-cd.md, docs/index.md, and docs/llms-full.txt to (1) add a note that published Docker images run as a non-root appuser and (2) bump example GitHub Action version pins in docs from @0.44.0 to @0.66.3. There are no changes to generated code output, Jinja2 templates, CLI options, the Python API, default values/behavior, supported Python versions, or error handling. The deleted lines are only the old doc version strings. None of the breaking-change categories apply.

---

This analysis was performed by Claude Code Action

[github-actions]

🎉 Released in 0.67.0

This PR is now available in the latest release. See the release notes for details.