Skip to content

Closed duplicate#3558

Closed
koxudaxi wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
codex/import-cache-guard
Closed

Closed duplicate#3558
koxudaxi wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
codex/import-cache-guard

Conversation

@koxudaxi

@koxudaxi koxudaxi commented Jul 3, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

No description provided.

@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Jul 3, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Important

Review skipped

Draft detected.

Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the .coderabbit.yaml file in this repository. To trigger a single review, invoke the @coderabbitai review command.

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

Run ID: 5b450bb3-dfe9-40b8-88de-8008a25e2cef

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.

Use the checkbox below for a quick retry:

  • 🔍 Trigger review
✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Commit unit tests in branch codex/import-cache-guard

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

@github-actions

github-actions Bot commented Jul 3, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

📚 Docs Preview: https://pr-3558.datamodel-code-generator.pages.dev

@codspeed-hq

codspeed-hq Bot commented Jul 3, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Merging this PR will not alter performance

⚠️ Unknown Walltime execution environment detected

Using the Walltime instrument on standard Hosted Runners will lead to inconsistent data.

For the most accurate results, we recommend using CodSpeed Macro Runners: bare-metal machines fine-tuned for performance measurement consistency.

✅ 11 untouched benchmarks
⏩ 98 skipped benchmarks1


Comparing codex/import-cache-guard (785db58) with main (a4e8215)

Open in CodSpeed

Footnotes

  1. 98 benchmarks were skipped, so the baseline results were used instead. If they were deleted from the codebase, click here and archive them to remove them from the performance reports.

@codecov

codecov Bot commented Jul 3, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 100.00%. Comparing base (a4e8215) to head (785db58).

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##              main     #3558    +/-   ##
==========================================
  Coverage   100.00%   100.00%            
==========================================
  Files          163       163            
  Lines        34608     34709   +101     
  Branches      4031      4031            
==========================================
+ Hits         34608     34709   +101     
Flag Coverage Δ
unittests 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Harness.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@koxudaxi koxudaxi closed this Jul 3, 2026
@koxudaxi koxudaxi deleted the codex/import-cache-guard branch July 3, 2026 06:26
@koxudaxi koxudaxi changed the title [codex] Guard generation imports cache contract Closed duplicate Jul 3, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant