Skip to content

Update CHANGELOG for 0.68.1#3594

Merged
koxudaxi merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
docs/changelog-0.68.1
Jul 8, 2026
Merged

Update CHANGELOG for 0.68.1#3594
koxudaxi merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
docs/changelog-0.68.1

Conversation

@dcg-generated-docs

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Updates CHANGELOG.md for 0.68.1.

This PR was created automatically after publishing release a241d42.

@github-actions

github-actions Bot commented Jul 8, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

📚 Docs Preview: https://pr-3594.datamodel-code-generator.pages.dev

@codspeed-hq

codspeed-hq Bot commented Jul 8, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Merging this PR will degrade performance by 12.39%

⚠️ Unknown Walltime execution environment detected

Using the Walltime instrument on standard Hosted Runners will lead to inconsistent data.

For the most accurate results, we recommend using CodSpeed Macro Runners: bare-metal machines fine-tuned for performance measurement consistency.

❌ 13 regressed benchmarks
⏩ 98 skipped benchmarks1

Warning

Please fix the performance issues or acknowledge them on CodSpeed.

Performance Changes

Mode Benchmark BASE HEAD Efficiency
WallTime test_perf_large_models_pydantic_v2_builtin 872.4 ms 1,038.9 ms -16.02%
WallTime test_perf_large_models_pydantic_v2_noformat 825.1 ms 978.7 ms -15.7%
WallTime test_perf_aws_style_openapi_pydantic_v2 1.8 s 2.1 s -14.51%
WallTime test_perf_openapi_large 2.8 s 3.3 s -12.98%
WallTime test_perf_graphql_style_pydantic_v2 742.9 ms 850.5 ms -12.65%
WallTime test_perf_complex_refs 1.9 s 2.1 s -11.6%
WallTime test_perf_large_models_pydantic_v2 3.4 s 3.8 s -11.56%
WallTime test_perf_kubernetes_style_pydantic_v2 2.5 s 2.8 s -11.5%
WallTime test_perf_all_options_enabled 5.1 s 5.8 s -11.2%
WallTime test_perf_stripe_style_pydantic_v2 1.9 s 2.1 s -11.01%
WallTime test_perf_duplicate_names 988.2 ms 1,108.7 ms -10.87%
WallTime test_perf_multiple_files_input 3.3 s 3.7 s -10.86%
WallTime test_perf_deep_nested 4.9 s 5.5 s -10.35%

Tip

Investigate this regression by commenting @codspeedbot fix this regression on this PR, or directly use the CodSpeed MCP with your agent.


Comparing docs/changelog-0.68.1 (51c2a65) with main (a241d42)

Open in CodSpeed

Footnotes

  1. 98 benchmarks were skipped, so the baseline results were used instead. If they were deleted from the codebase, click here and archive them to remove them from the performance reports.

@codecov

codecov Bot commented Jul 8, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 100.00%. Comparing base (a241d42) to head (51c2a65).

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##              main     #3594   +/-   ##
=========================================
  Coverage   100.00%   100.00%           
=========================================
  Files          164       164           
  Lines        35325     35325           
  Branches      4078      4078           
=========================================
  Hits         35325     35325           
Flag Coverage Δ
unittests 100.00% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Harness.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@koxudaxi koxudaxi merged commit 3ee5e04 into main Jul 8, 2026
57 of 58 checks passed
@koxudaxi koxudaxi deleted the docs/changelog-0.68.1 branch July 8, 2026 01:46
@github-actions

github-actions Bot commented Jul 8, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Breaking Change Analysis

Result: No breaking changes detected

Reasoning: The prepared diff touches only CHANGELOG.md, adding the auto-generated release notes for version 0.68.1. There are no changes to generated code output, Jinja2 templates, CLI options, the Python API, default values/behavior, supported Python versions, or error handling. The deleted-lines file is empty, so nothing was removed. This is a documentation-only change and therefore contains no breaking changes.


This analysis was performed by Claude Code Action

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant