Skip to content

GHSA-c2c7-rcm5-vvqj found in npm/picomatch@4.0.3 #154

Description

@devguard-bot-dev

GHSA-c2c7-rcm5-vvqj found in npm/picomatch@4.0.3

Important

Risk: 3.46 (Low)
CVSS: 7.5

Description

Impact

picomatch is vulnerable to Regular Expression Denial of Service (ReDoS) when processing crafted extglob patterns. Certain patterns using extglob quantifiers such as +() and *(), especially when combined with overlapping alternatives or nested extglobs, are compiled into regular expressions that can exhibit catastrophic backtracking on non-matching input.

Examples of problematic patterns include +(a|aa), +(*|?), +(+(a)), *(+(a)), and +(+(+(a))). In local reproduction, these patterns caused multi-second event-loop blocking with relatively short inputs. For example, +(a|aa) compiled to ^(?:(?=.)(?:a|aa)+)$ and took about 2 seconds to reject a 41-character non-matching input, while nested patterns such as +(+(a)) and *(+(a)) took around 29 seconds to reject a 33-character input on a modern M1 MacBook.

Applications are impacted when they allow untrusted users to supply glob patterns that are passed to picomatch for compilation or matching. In those cases, an attacker can cause excessive CPU consumption and block the Node.js event loop, resulting in a denial of service. Applications that only use trusted, developer-controlled glob patterns are much less likely to be exposed in a security-relevant way.

Patches

This issue is fixed in picomatch 4.0.4, 3.0.2 and 2.3.2.

Users should upgrade to one of these versions or later, depending on their supported release line.

Workarounds

If upgrading is not immediately possible, avoid passing untrusted glob patterns to picomatch.

Possible mitigations include:

  • disable extglob support for untrusted patterns by using noextglob: true
  • reject or sanitize patterns containing nested extglobs or extglob quantifiers such as +() and *()
  • enforce strict allowlists for accepted pattern syntax
  • run matching in an isolated worker or separate process with time and resource limits
  • apply application-level request throttling and input validation for any endpoint that accepts glob patterns

Resources

Affected component

The vulnerability is in pkg:npm/picomatch@4.0.3, found in artifacts pkg:oci/devguard-documentation?repository_url=ghcr.io/l3montree-dev/devguard-documentation&arch=amd64&tag=main-amd64, pkg:oci/l3montree-cybersecurity/devguard/devguard-documentation.

Recommended fix

Upgrade to version 4.0.4 or later.

# Update all vulnerable npm packages
npm audit fix
# Update only this package
npm install picomatch@4.0.4 

Additional guidance for mitigating vulnerabilities

Visit our guides on devguard.org

See more details...

Path to component

 %%{init: { 'theme':'base', 'themeVariables': {
'primaryColor': '#F3F3F3',
'primaryTextColor': '#0D1117',
'primaryBorderColor': '#999999',
'lineColor': '#999999',
'secondaryColor': '#ffffff',
'tertiaryColor': '#ffffff'
} }}%%
 flowchart TD
Your_application(["Your application"]) --- pkg_npm_picomatch_4_0_3(["pkg:npm/picomatch\@4.0.3"])

classDef default stroke-width:2px
Loading
Risk Factor Value Description
Vulnerability Depth 1 The vulnerability is in a direct dependency of your project.
EPSS 0.41 % The exploit probability is very low. The vulnerability is unlikely to be exploited in the next 30 days.
EXPLOIT Not available We did not find any exploit available. Neither in GitHub repositories nor in the Exploit-Database. There are no script kiddies exploiting this vulnerability.
CVSS-BE 7.5 - Exploiting this vulnerability significantly impacts availability.
CVSS-B 7.5 - The vulnerability can be exploited over the network without needing physical access.
- It is easy for an attacker to exploit this vulnerability.
- An attacker does not need any special privileges or access rights.
- No user interaction is needed for the attacker to exploit this vulnerability.
- The impact is confined to the system where the vulnerability exists.
- There is a high impact on the availability of the system.

More details can be found in DevGuard


Interact with this vulnerability

You can use the following slash commands to interact with this vulnerability:

👍 Reply with this to acknowledge and accept the identified risk.

/accept I accept the risk of this vulnerability, because ...

⚠️ Mark the risk as false positive: Use one of these commands if you believe the reported vulnerability is not actually a valid issue.

/component-not-present The vulnerable component is not included in the artifact.
/vulnerable-code-not-present The component is present, but the vulnerable code is not included or compiled.
/vulnerable-code-not-in-execute-path The vulnerable code exists, but is never executed at runtime.
/vulnerable-code-cannot-be-controlled-by-adversary Built-in protections prevent exploitation of this vulnerability.
/inline-mitigations-already-exist The vulnerable code cannot be controlled or influenced by an attacker.

🔁 Reopen the risk: Use this command to reopen a previously closed or accepted vulnerability.

/reopen ... 

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Type

    No type

    Fields

    No fields configured for issues without a type.

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions