|
| 1 | +import unittest |
| 2 | +from evaluation_function.truth_table.evaluate import evaluate_truth_table |
| 3 | + |
| 4 | + |
| 5 | +class TestEvaluateTruthTable(unittest.TestCase): |
| 6 | + |
| 7 | + def test_empty_input(self): |
| 8 | + """Test that empty input returns False with appropriate error""" |
| 9 | + result = evaluate_truth_table([], 0) |
| 10 | + self.assertFalse(result.is_correct) |
| 11 | + # self.assertEqual(len(result.feedback_items), 1) |
| 12 | + # self.assertIn("no input", str(result.feedback_items[0][1])) |
| 13 | + |
| 14 | + def test_only_header_row(self): |
| 15 | + """Test that providing only formulas without values returns False""" |
| 16 | + result = evaluate_truth_table([["p"]], 1) |
| 17 | + self.assertFalse(result.is_correct) |
| 18 | + # self.assertIn("Must provide names and its truth values", str(result.feedback_items[0][1])) |
| 19 | + |
| 20 | + def test_simple_valid_truth_table_one_atom(self): |
| 21 | + """Test a valid truth table with one atom""" |
| 22 | + input_table = [ |
| 23 | + ["p"], |
| 24 | + ["tt"], |
| 25 | + ["ff"] |
| 26 | + ] |
| 27 | + result = evaluate_truth_table(input_table, 1) |
| 28 | + self.assertTrue(result.is_correct) |
| 29 | + |
| 30 | + def test_valid_truth_table_two_atoms(self): |
| 31 | + """Test a valid truth table with two atoms and a compound formula""" |
| 32 | + input_table = [ |
| 33 | + ["p", "q", "p ∧ q"], |
| 34 | + ["tt", "tt", "tt"], |
| 35 | + ["tt", "ff", "ff"], |
| 36 | + ["ff", "tt", "ff"], |
| 37 | + ["ff", "ff", "ff"] |
| 38 | + ] |
| 39 | + result = evaluate_truth_table(input_table, 2) |
| 40 | + self.assertTrue(result.is_correct) |
| 41 | + |
| 42 | + def test_valid_truth_table_with_or(self): |
| 43 | + """Test a valid truth table with OR operation""" |
| 44 | + input_table = [ |
| 45 | + ["p", "q", "p ∨ q"], |
| 46 | + ["tt", "tt", "tt"], |
| 47 | + ["tt", "ff", "tt"], |
| 48 | + ["ff", "tt", "tt"], |
| 49 | + ["ff", "ff", "ff"] |
| 50 | + ] |
| 51 | + result = evaluate_truth_table(input_table, 2) |
| 52 | + self.assertTrue(result.is_correct) |
| 53 | + |
| 54 | + def test_valid_truth_table_with_implication(self): |
| 55 | + """Test a valid truth table with implication""" |
| 56 | + input_table = [ |
| 57 | + ["p", "q", "p → q"], |
| 58 | + ["tt", "tt", "tt"], |
| 59 | + ["tt", "ff", "ff"], |
| 60 | + ["ff", "tt", "tt"], |
| 61 | + ["ff", "ff", "tt"] |
| 62 | + ] |
| 63 | + result = evaluate_truth_table(input_table, 2) |
| 64 | + self.assertTrue(result.is_correct) |
| 65 | + |
| 66 | + def test_valid_truth_table_with_negation(self): |
| 67 | + """Test a valid truth table with negation""" |
| 68 | + input_table = [ |
| 69 | + ["p", "¬p"], |
| 70 | + ["tt", "ff"], |
| 71 | + ["ff", "tt"] |
| 72 | + ] |
| 73 | + result = evaluate_truth_table(input_table, 1) |
| 74 | + self.assertTrue(result.is_correct) |
| 75 | + |
| 76 | + def test_invalid_formula_syntax(self): |
| 77 | + """Test that invalid formula syntax is caught""" |
| 78 | + input_table = [ |
| 79 | + ["p", "q ∧"], |
| 80 | + ["tt", "tt"], |
| 81 | + ["ff", "ff"] |
| 82 | + ] |
| 83 | + result = evaluate_truth_table(input_table, 2) |
| 84 | + self.assertFalse(result.is_correct) |
| 85 | + # self.assertIn("formula in column 2 incorrect", str(result.feedback_items[0][1])) |
| 86 | + |
| 87 | + def test_undefined_atom_in_formula(self): |
| 88 | + """Test that using an undefined atom in a formula is caught""" |
| 89 | + input_table = [ |
| 90 | + ["p", "p ∧ q"], |
| 91 | + ["tt", "tt"], |
| 92 | + ["ff", "ff"] |
| 93 | + ] |
| 94 | + result = evaluate_truth_table(input_table, 2) |
| 95 | + self.assertFalse(result.is_correct) |
| 96 | + # self.assertIn("undefined", str(result.feedback_items[0][1])) |
| 97 | + |
| 98 | + def test_invalid_cell_value(self): |
| 99 | + """Test that invalid cell values are caught""" |
| 100 | + input_table = [ |
| 101 | + ["p"], |
| 102 | + ["true"], |
| 103 | + ["ff"] |
| 104 | + ] |
| 105 | + result = evaluate_truth_table(input_table, 1) |
| 106 | + self.assertFalse(result.is_correct) |
| 107 | + # self.assertIn("invalid", str(result.feedback_items[0][1])) |
| 108 | + |
| 109 | + def test_missing_combinations(self): |
| 110 | + """Test that missing combinations are detected""" |
| 111 | + input_table = [ |
| 112 | + ["p", "q"], |
| 113 | + ["tt", "tt"], |
| 114 | + ["tt", "ff"] |
| 115 | + ] |
| 116 | + result = evaluate_truth_table(input_table, 2) |
| 117 | + self.assertFalse(result.is_correct) |
| 118 | + # self.assertIn("missing combinations", str(result.feedback_items[0][1])) |
| 119 | + |
| 120 | + def test_excessive_combinations(self): |
| 121 | + """Test that excessive combinations are detected""" |
| 122 | + input_table = [ |
| 123 | + ["p", "q"], |
| 124 | + ["tt", "tt"], |
| 125 | + ["tt", "ff"], |
| 126 | + ["ff", "tt"], |
| 127 | + ["ff", "ff"], |
| 128 | + ["tt", "tt"] |
| 129 | + ] |
| 130 | + result = evaluate_truth_table(input_table, 2) |
| 131 | + self.assertFalse(result.is_correct) |
| 132 | + # self.assertIn("excessive combinations", str(result.feedback_items[0][1])) |
| 133 | + |
| 134 | + def test_duplicate_assignments(self): |
| 135 | + """Test that duplicate assignments are detected""" |
| 136 | + input_table = [ |
| 137 | + ["p", "q"], |
| 138 | + ["tt", "tt"], |
| 139 | + ["tt", "ff"], |
| 140 | + ["tt", "tt"], |
| 141 | + ["ff", "ff"] |
| 142 | + ] |
| 143 | + result = evaluate_truth_table(input_table, 2) |
| 144 | + self.assertFalse(result.is_correct) |
| 145 | + # self.assertIn("duplicated assignment", str(result.feedback_items[0][1])) |
| 146 | + |
| 147 | + def test_incorrect_cell_evaluation(self): |
| 148 | + """Test that incorrect cell values are detected""" |
| 149 | + input_table = [ |
| 150 | + ["p", "q", "p ∧ q"], |
| 151 | + ["tt", "tt", "ff"], # Should be tt |
| 152 | + ["tt", "ff", "ff"], |
| 153 | + ["ff", "tt", "ff"], |
| 154 | + ["ff", "ff", "ff"] |
| 155 | + ] |
| 156 | + result = evaluate_truth_table(input_table, 2) |
| 157 | + self.assertFalse(result.is_correct) |
| 158 | + # self.assertIn("incorrect cell value", str(result.feedback_items[0][1])) |
| 159 | + |
| 160 | + def test_wrong_number_of_atoms(self): |
| 161 | + """Test when num_atoms doesn't match the actual atoms in table""" |
| 162 | + input_table = [ |
| 163 | + ["p", "q"], |
| 164 | + ["tt", "tt"], |
| 165 | + ["tt", "ff"], |
| 166 | + ["ff", "tt"], |
| 167 | + ["ff", "ff"] |
| 168 | + ] |
| 169 | + result = evaluate_truth_table(input_table, 3) |
| 170 | + self.assertFalse(result.is_correct) |
| 171 | + |
| 172 | + def test_complex_formula(self): |
| 173 | + """Test a valid truth table with a complex formula""" |
| 174 | + input_table = [ |
| 175 | + ["p", "q", "(p → q) ∧ (q → p)"], |
| 176 | + ["tt", "tt", "tt"], |
| 177 | + ["tt", "ff", "ff"], |
| 178 | + ["ff", "tt", "ff"], |
| 179 | + ["ff", "ff", "tt"] |
| 180 | + ] |
| 181 | + result = evaluate_truth_table(input_table, 2) |
| 182 | + self.assertTrue(result.is_correct) |
| 183 | + |
| 184 | + |
| 185 | +if __name__ == '__main__': |
| 186 | + unittest.main() |
0 commit comments