doc(Probability/HasLaw): mention MeasurePreserving in the docstring#39608
Open
EtienneC30 wants to merge 1 commit into
Open
doc(Probability/HasLaw): mention MeasurePreserving in the docstring#39608EtienneC30 wants to merge 1 commit into
MeasurePreserving in the docstring#39608EtienneC30 wants to merge 1 commit into
Conversation
EtienneC30
commented
May 20, 2026
Member
PR summary 1b8f449241Import changes for modified filesNo significant changes to the import graph Import changes for all files
|
Contributor
|
Maybe you could also add a comment in the docstring of |
jvanwinden
reviewed
May 20, 2026
| we often use almost-everywhere equality and only need a.e.-measurability hypotheses. | ||
| However, if one wants to state `HasLaw f μ P` for a certain explicit function `f` that is not | ||
| only `AEMeasurable` but `Measurable`, then one should state `MeasureTheory.MeasurePreserving f P μ` | ||
| instead and rely on lemmas in this file that link the two notions. |
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Suggested change
| instead and rely on lemmas in this file that link the two notions. | |
| instead and rely on `MeasureTheory.MeasurePreserving.hasLaw` and `HasLaw.measurePreserving` to convert between the two notions. |
Member
Author
There was a problem hiding this comment.
There is also MeasureTheory.MeasurePreserving.comp_hasLaw which I think is actually more useful.
| we often use almost-everywhere equality and only need a.e.-measurability hypotheses. | ||
| However, if one wants to state `HasLaw f μ P` for a certain explicit function `f` that is not | ||
| only `AEMeasurable` but `Measurable`, then one should state `MeasureTheory.MeasurePreserving f P μ` | ||
| instead and rely on lemmas in this file that link the two notions. -/ |
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment.
same as above
Suggested change
| instead and rely on lemmas in this file that link the two notions. -/ | |
| instead and rely on `MeasureTheory.MeasurePreserving.hasLaw` and `HasLaw.measurePreserving` to convert between the two notions. -/ |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.