chore(Analysis/RCLike/Basic): state norm_I with positive polarity#41585
Draft
kim-em wants to merge 1 commit into
Draft
chore(Analysis/RCLike/Basic): state norm_I with positive polarity#41585kim-em wants to merge 1 commit into
kim-em wants to merge 1 commit into
Conversation
Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
PR summary 560ce3d069Import changes for modified filesNo significant changes to the import graph Import changes for all files
|
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This PR restates
RCLike.norm_Iwith theifcondition in positive polarity, changing the RHS fromif (I : K) ≠ 0 then 1 else 0toif (I : K) = 0 then 0 else 1. The latter is the simp-normal form (ne_eqandite_notrewrite the former to it) and matches every comparableif _ = 0 then 0 else 1statement in Mathlib; the negated form was the only one of its kind. The proof is unchanged and there are no downstream uses of the lemma yet.Follow-up to #41359 (feat(Analysis/RCLike/Basic): add norm_I).
🤖 Prepared with Claude Code