Adjust upki wording (#2190)

Author: mcpherrinm

content/en/post/2026-04-10-test-sites.md

@@ -46,7 +46,7 @@ And finally, we need a webserver to host the certificates. We're using Go, which
 
 ## Visiting the sites
 
-If you visit one of our revoked sites, you might not get an error message. Revocation checking in browsers varies pretty widely, and has historically not worked great. Today's state-of-the-art is [Firefox's CRLite](https://hacks.mozilla.org/2025/08/crlite-fast-private-and-comprehensive-certificate-revocation-checking-in-firefox/), which is efficient and reliable. Ubuntu is deploying the same technology in their [upki](https://discourse.ubuntu.com/t/an-update-on-upki/77063) project. We hope other browsers and operating systems follow suit. The upki project is a great example of a project [making use of](https://github.com/rustls/upki/tree/main/revoke-test) these revoked test certificates, too.
+If you visit one of our revoked sites, you might not get an error message. Revocation checking in browsers varies pretty widely, and has historically not worked great. Today's state-of-the-art is [Firefox's CRLite](https://hacks.mozilla.org/2025/08/crlite-fast-private-and-comprehensive-certificate-revocation-checking-in-firefox/), which is efficient and reliable. Ubuntu is deploying [upki](https://discourse.ubuntu.com/t/an-update-on-upki/77063), a Rustls project based on CRLite. We hope other browsers and operating systems follow suit. The upki project is a great example of a project [making use of](https://github.com/rustls/upki/tree/main/revoke-test) these revoked test certificates, too.
 
 The actual content of the website isn't terribly important: We just have a little HTML page explaining what the site is. But since this website is meant for testing clients, there's more than just browsers connecting. In particular, it's pretty routine that I try connecting with `curl` or some other terminal http client, and getting a bunch of HTML spewed to your terminal isn't very nice.