Context
After the current hardening pass, the next level of transfer differentiation is no longer basic SFTP correctness. It is advanced transfer strategy.
These ideas are promising but should remain research backlog until the current engine is validated across real servers and the operational model is stable.
Why last
- advanced modes are easy to over-design before interop evidence exists
- resume and compression have real correctness and compatibility risks
- research should start from a stable baseline, not from open questions in the current transfer engine
What to evaluate
- stronger destination integrity verification beyond
stat
- checksum / hash verification
- guarded resume support
- adaptive compression for compressible payloads
- eventual delta-sync / rsync-like strategies
Constraints
- Do not weaken the current safe default path
- Do not adopt
fastPut / fastGet as the unconditional default
- Treat resume and compression as opt-in until proven safe and useful
- Keep this issue research-only until at least
#38 is complete
Definition of Done
Related issues
- Should follow:
#38
- Should not block:
#37, #39, #40
Priority
Low-medium. Valuable for future differentiation, but not a prerequisite for current release quality.
Context
After the current hardening pass, the next level of transfer differentiation is no longer basic SFTP correctness. It is advanced transfer strategy.
These ideas are promising but should remain research backlog until the current engine is validated across real servers and the operational model is stable.
Why last
What to evaluate
statConstraints
fastPut/fastGetas the unconditional default#38is completeDefinition of Done
Related issues
#38#37,#39,#40Priority
Low-medium. Valuable for future differentiation, but not a prerequisite for current release quality.