fix(ci): tighten issue-quality soft-pass structure gate

Require at least two rich markdown sections before soft-pass, and treat provider metadata headings as mapped so partial English forms cannot bypass Current/Expected behaviour.

Author: Wibias

.github/scripts/issue-quality.cjs

@@ -150,10 +150,11 @@ function resolveSection(body, headings) {
 }
 
 /**
- * True when the body has at least one non-empty h2–h4 section with enough
- * detail. Used for soft-pass only — unstructured length alone is not enough.
+ * True when the body has multiple non-empty h2–h4 sections with enough detail.
+ * Soft-pass only — unstructured length alone is not enough, and a single
+ * arbitrary heading must not bypass the quality gate (Codex on #564).
  */
-function hasSubstantialStructuredContent(body, minSectionLen = 40) {
+function hasSubstantialStructuredContent(body, minSectionLen = 40, minRichSections = 2) {
   if (typeof body !== "string") return false;
   const lines = body.split("\n");
   let capturing = false;
@@ -173,7 +174,7 @@ function hasSubstantialStructuredContent(body, minSectionLen = 40) {
     if (capturing) bucket.push(line);
   }
   if (capturing) flush();
-  return richSections >= 1;
+  return richSections >= minRichSections;
 }
 
 // ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
@@ -695,7 +696,8 @@ function validateIssue(issue) {
       // Same soft-pass as bug/feature: label- or maintainer-scoped provider
       // reports often use non-English structured headings after a retitle.
       const mappedHeadingPresent =
-        current !== null || expected !== null || repro !== null || response !== null || docs !== null;
+        current !== null || expected !== null || repro !== null || response !== null || docs !== null ||
+        provider !== null || version !== null || endpoint !== null;
       const canSoftPass =
         !mappedHeadingPresent &&
         hasSubstantialStructuredContent(body);

.github/scripts/issue-quality.test.cjs

@@ -1049,6 +1049,44 @@ describe("translated feature headings and soft-pass", () => {
     assert.equal(result.valid, false);
   });
 
+  it("does not soft-pass a single arbitrary rich heading (Codex #564)", () => {
+    const result = validateIssue({
+      title: "Something broke after upgrade",
+      body: [
+        "## Notes",
+        "x".repeat(80),
+      ].join("\n"),
+      labels: ["bug"],
+      storedKind: "bug",
+    });
+    assert.equal(result.kind, "bug");
+    assert.equal(result.softPass, false);
+    assert.equal(result.valid, false);
+    assert.match(result.reasons.join(" "), /Summary and Reproduction are empty/);
+  });
+
+  it("does not soft-pass provider reports that only fill mapped metadata headings", () => {
+    const result = validateIssue({
+      title: "Provider X fails on Responses",
+      body: [
+        "### Provider or upstream service",
+        "custom-openai-compatible gateway hosted on our internal mesh",
+        "### OpenCodex version",
+        "2.7.41",
+        "### Endpoint or capability",
+        "`POST /v1/responses` with streaming tool calls",
+        "## Extra notes",
+        "We see intermittent 502s after rotating the upstream API key for this gateway.",
+      ].join("\n"),
+      labels: ["provider-compatibility"],
+      storedKind: "provider-compatibility",
+    });
+    assert.equal(result.kind, "provider-compatibility");
+    assert.equal(result.softPass, false);
+    assert.equal(result.valid, false);
+    assert.match(result.reasons.join(" "), /current behaviour|expected behaviour/i);
+  });
+
   it("still rejects empty [Feature]: bodies", () => {
     const result = validateIssue({
       title: "[Feature]: do something cool",