fix(providers): Copilot mixed-wire routing, DeepSeek service_tier + reasoning replay, Claude 4.6/4.7 1M windows

devlog/_plan/260802_client_toggle_api/000_plan.md

@@ -0,0 +1,134 @@
+# 000 — Plan: client-integration toggle research (API-side on/off switch)
+
+Research unit. Docs-only: this unit produces survey and design-option documents,
+not production code. Implementation, if approved later, gets its own decade docs
+in a follow-up cycle.
+
+Parent unit: `devlog/_plan/260731_client_config_export/` (the read-only export
+surface this unit extends). Sibling survey `001_client_config_survey.md` there
+already covers Pi/OpenCode injection layers and the no-standard landscape; this
+unit does not re-survey them.
+
+## Loop spec
+
+- Loop archetype: spec-satisfaction research (verifier defines done).
+- Trigger: user request — can client integrations be applied as an API-side
+  on/off switch (enable writes the provider block into the client config,
+  disable removes it), for Hermes Agent, OpenClaw, Kimi Code CLI, and
+  Gajae Code, with cc-switch as the reference implementation.
+- Goal: durable devlog evidence answering (a) how cc-switch implements
+  apply/remove, (b) what each of the four clients requires for a safe external
+  toggle, (c) what shape an opencodex management-API toggle would take and its
+  risks.
+- Non-goals: no `src/`, `gui/`, or test changes; no new clients serialized in
+  `config-export.ts`; no implementation plan at diff level (that is the next
+  cycle's decade docs, only if the design is approved).
+- Verifier: every load-bearing claim carries a source URL or repo file path
+  opened this cycle (cxc-search Tier 2); unverifiable claims are marked
+  `candidate — unverified` and listed as open questions. `bun run
+  privacy:scan` stays green.
+- Stop condition: all four clients + cc-switch lane questions answered or
+  explicitly marked unreachable.
+- Memory artifact: this unit's 001–003 docs.
+- Expected terminal outcomes: DONE (docs written, claims sourced) or BLOCKED
+  (sources unreachable, named).
+- Escalation: a client whose config cannot be toggled safely from outside is a
+  finding, not a failure — record the blocker and mark that client UNSAFE for
+  the toggle design.
+
+## Research questions
+
+### Q1 — cc-switch reference mechanics (doc 001)
+
+- How does cc-switch apply a provider into each app's config (writer modules,
+  atomic write, backup/restore), and how does it remove or restore one?
+- Does it offer any local HTTP API / relay ("universal endpoint") as an
+  alternative to file writes?
+- What state does it own (`~/.cc-switch/config.json`) versus mutate in the
+  client's files?
+
+### Q2 — Per-client toggle requirements (doc 002)
+
+For each of Hermes Agent, OpenClaw, Kimi Code CLI, Gajae Code:
+
+- Config file, format, and the minimal provider block that points at
+  `http://127.0.0.1:<port>/v1`.
+- Hot-reload semantics: does the client re-read the file, or only at
+  session/process start? What does "applies on toggle" mean in practice?
+- Non-interactive management surface, if any (CLI subcommands, local API),
+  which would beat raw file writes.
+- Credential handling: env-reference support versus literal-only (decides
+  whether the no-secret-serialization invariant survives a write path).
+- Removal semantics: what must be cleaned up beyond the provider block
+  (default model pointers, sessions, auth storage).
+
+### Q3 — opencodex API toggle design options (doc 003)
+
+- Current surface: `GET /api/client-config` is read-only by design; mutating
+  precedents exist (`PUT /api/disabled-models`, `PUT /api/model-visibility`).
+- Trust boundary (A-gate amendment, blocker 2): the toggle endpoint lives on
+  the **management plane** — every `/api/*` request passes
+  `requireManagementAuth`, loopback GUI sessions are origin-bound, and
+  mutations require CSRF (`src/server/management-auth.ts`,
+  `src/server/index.ts:448`). This is separate from **data-plane** admission
+  (`resolveApiAuth` in `src/server/auth-cors.ts`), whose loopback shortcut
+  only decides what a *client* must send to `/v1`. Doc 003 must not conflate
+  the two.
+- Launcher precedence (A-gate amendment, blocker 3): `ocx opencode` injects
+  `provider.opencodex` through `OPENCODE_CONFIG_CONTENT`, which outranks the
+  disk config for that process (`src/cli/opencode.ts`). Read-back must
+  distinguish "disk state" from "runtime state when launched via `ocx`", and
+  the design must say whether the disk toggle even applies to OpenCode.
+- Design space: `PUT /api/client-config/:client {enabled: bool}` or a
+  `/api/client-integrations` resource; read-back/health (is our block present
+  and current?) versus fire-and-forget writes.
+- State model (A-gate amendment, blocker 4): no cc-switch-style DB exists, so
+  "is it on?" must be read back from the client file. A boolean `enabled`
+  hides drift; the design needs richer states — `absent`, `current`, `stale`
+  (our block but not what we would generate now), `conflict` (a block with our
+  provider id that we did not write), `unsafe` (unparseable file / damaged
+  ownership markers).
+- Invariants to carry over: no secret serialized, additive merge only,
+  preserve unknown fields, atomic write + backup, never touch blocks we did
+  not write.
+
+### Q4 — Local writer/read-back precedents (doc 003, A-gate amendment)
+
+- `src/grok/inject.ts` — the repo's one existing third-party config writer:
+  BEGIN/END managed fence in `~/.grok/config.toml`, orphan-marker refusal,
+  non-loopback refusal with credential-fallthrough reasoning, placeholder
+  `api_key = "opencodex-loopback"` (never a real secret), `stripGrokConfig`
+  removal path.
+- `src/grok/status.ts` — the read-only status reader paired with the writer;
+  parses only our own fenced region.
+- `src/config.ts` `atomicWriteFile`/`renameAtomicFile` — temp+rename, Windows
+  EBUSY/EPERM/EACCES retry with backoff, 0o600 mode, ACL hardening, residual
+  temp scrubbing.
+- Claude Desktop writer/reader — second precedent to survey in 003.
+- Risk register: format fidelity (YAML/JSON5/TOML round-trip), concurrent
+  writes while the client runs, clients that rewrite their own config
+  (Kimi Code), drift between proxy catalog and written model list.
+
+## Doc map (000-range, research only)
+
+- `000_plan.md` — this document.
+- `001_ccswitch_toggle_analysis.md` — Q1 findings.
+- `002_client_toggle_matrix.md` — Q2 findings, one section per client.
+- `003_api_design_options.md` — Q3 design space + risk register + open
+  questions. Options, not a commitment.
+- `004_ux_design.md` — (cycle 2) GUI design for the unified integrations
+  surface: tab rename, hero with install detection + switches, per-client
+  sub-pages, and the rollback UX that makes the toggle trustworthy. Design
+  spec only; component diffs belong to a later implementation cycle.
+
+## Dispatch plan
+
+- 5 research lanes (subagents, read-only): cc-switch, Hermes, OpenClaw,
+  Kimi Code, Gajae Code. Lane output is candidate evidence; load-bearing
+  claims are re-opened by the main agent before promotion (cxc-search proof
+  handoff).
+- Local (main agent): current management-API surface, GUI consumer, loopback
+  admission semantics — already read this cycle:
+  `src/clients/config-export.ts`, `src/server/management/model-routes.ts`,
+  `src/server/auth-cors.ts` (`resolveApiAuth`, loopback admission),
+  `gui/src/components/apikeys-workspace/client-config-clients.ts`.

devlog/_plan/260802_client_toggle_api/001_ccswitch_toggle_analysis.md

@@ -0,0 +1,101 @@
+# 001 — cc-switch toggle mechanics (reference implementation)
+
+Research only. No diffs here. Sources were opened against upstream `main` on
+2026-08-02 via the GitHub API (research lane Zeno, main-agent spot-check of the
+two load-bearing claims).
+
+cc-switch v3.17.0 (Tauri 2, Rust + React) manages Claude Code, Claude Desktop,
+Codex, Gemini CLI, Grok Build, OpenCode, OpenClaw, and Hermes Agent. It is the
+closest shipping implementation of the "on/off switch per client app" this unit
+evaluates. Its own provider store is `~/.cc-switch/cc-switch.db` (SQLite), with
+`settings.json` for device preferences and `backups/` for database backups
+([README.md#L302-L305](https://github.com/farion1231/cc-switch/blob/main/README.md#L302-L305),
+[database/mod.rs#L96-L109](https://github.com/farion1231/cc-switch/blob/main/src-tauri/src/database/mod.rs#L96-L109)).
+
+## 1. Two app classes: exclusive vs additive
+
+The toggle semantics split on whether the client keeps one active provider or
+many coexisting ones:
+
+| Class | Clients | "Switch on" means | "Switch off" means |
+|-------|---------|-------------------|--------------------|
+| Exclusive | Claude Code, Codex, Gemini | backfill current live config into the stored provider record, then overwrite live config with the target provider | switching away backfills and overwrites with the next provider |
+| Additive | OpenCode, OpenClaw, Hermes | insert the provider entry into the client's live config, alongside existing ones | `remove_provider_from_live_config` deletes only that live entry; the provider stays in cc-switch's DB, marked `live_config_managed=false` |
+
+Source: [provider/mod.rs#L2893-L2951](https://github.com/farion1231/cc-switch/blob/main/src-tauri/src/services/provider/mod.rs#L2893-L2951),
+[provider/mod.rs#L2954-L2966](https://github.com/farion1231/cc-switch/blob/main/src-tauri/src/services/provider/mod.rs#L2954-L2966),
+[provider/mod.rs#L3087-L3146](https://github.com/farion1231/cc-switch/blob/main/src-tauri/src/services/provider/mod.rs#L3087-L3146).
+Main-agent spot-check: `live_config_managed` markers and
+`provider_live_config_managed` confirmed in `provider/mod.rs` (lines 1870,
+2437-2450).
+
+All four of this unit's target clients (Hermes, OpenClaw, and by their config
+shapes Kimi Code and Gajae Code) are **additive-class**: a toggle writes and
+removes one provider entry, never a whole-file takeover.
+
+## 2. Write discipline
+
+- Provider-specific writers project into native files: Claude ->
+  `~/.claude/settings.json`, Codex -> `~/.codex/auth.json` + `config.toml`,
+  OpenClaw -> `~/.openclaw/openclaw.json` (JSON5), Hermes ->
+  `~/.hermes/config.yaml` (YAML).
+- JSON/TOML/text writes go through a temporary sibling file + rename (atomic on
+  Unix; Windows removes the destination first).
+  [provider/live.rs#L1015-L1060](https://github.com/farion1231/cc-switch/blob/main/src-tauri/src/services/provider/live.rs#L1015-L1060),
+  [config.rs#L273-L351](https://github.com/farion1231/cc-switch/blob/main/src-tauri/src/config.rs#L273-L351)
+- Writer modules preserve unknown fields (`serde(flatten)` extra maps in
+  `hermes_config.rs` / `openclaw_config.rs`) and honor the client's own
+  config-dir overrides (`HERMES_HOME`, Windows `%LOCALAPPDATA%\hermes`).
+- Health warnings are returned on write (`OpenClawWriteOutcome.warnings`).
+
+## 3. Proxy takeover: the *other* kind of toggle
+
+cc-switch has a second, coarser switch — "proxy takeover" — which is
+backup-and-restore, not provider-entry deletion:
+
+1. Enable: start the local proxy if needed, snapshot the app's current live
+   config into the DB's live-backup storage, then write proxy
+   endpoint/placeholder fields into the client config.
+2. Disable/stop-with-restore: write the saved snapshot back and delete the
+   backup rows. Missing backup -> attempt SSOT/provider reconstruction and
+   placeholder cleanup.
+3. Switching providers *while* takeover is active is a hot switch: the client
+   keeps pointing at the local proxy and only the proxy's upstream target
+   changes.
+
+[services/proxy.rs#L730-L820](https://github.com/farion1231/cc-switch/blob/main/src-tauri/src/services/proxy.rs#L730-L820),
+[services/proxy.rs#L1292-L1323](https://github.com/farion1231/cc-switch/blob/main/src-tauri/src/services/proxy.rs#L1292-L1323),
+[services/proxy.rs#L1822-L1865](https://github.com/farion1231/cc-switch/blob/main/src-tauri/src/services/proxy.rs#L1822-L1865),
+[provider/mod.rs#L3004-L3054](https://github.com/farion1231/cc-switch/blob/main/src-tauri/src/services/provider/mod.rs#L3004-L3054)
+
+For opencodex this pattern is mostly redundant — opencodex *is* the proxy, so
+the client config only ever needs the additive provider entry; there is no
+upstream target to hot-switch inside the client.
+
+## 4. Universal endpoint (relay), not a management API
+
+cc-switch embeds an Axum server (default `http://127.0.0.1:15721`) exposing
+Claude / OpenAI Responses / Gemini routes plus health and status; tools point
+their base URL at it. It is a data-plane relay, **not** a control API — the
+toggle operations live in Tauri commands, and the only URL scheme is
+`ccswitch://v1/import?...` for config import.
+[proxy/server.rs#L100-L145](https://github.com/farion1231/cc-switch/blob/main/src-tauri/src/proxy/server.rs#L100-L145),
+[proxy/server.rs#L291-L366](https://github.com/farion1231/cc-switch/blob/main/src-tauri/src/proxy/server.rs#L291-L366),
+[deeplink/parser.rs#L11-L67](https://github.com/farion1231/cc-switch/blob/main/src-tauri/src/deeplink/parser.rs#L11-L67)
+
+Main-agent spot-check: `proxy/server.rs` binds
+`config.listen_address:listen_port` via tokio TcpListener (lines 101-145).
+
+## 5. What this means for an opencodex toggle
+
+- The additive per-client writer is the pattern to copy: insert/remove exactly
+  one provider entry, preserve everything else, atomic write, health warnings
+  on read-back.
+- cc-switch's "is it on?" state is *its own DB record* plus a
+  `live_config_managed` marker — it does not re-derive state from the client
+  file. An opencodex toggle has no such DB; state must be read back from the
+  client config itself (does our entry exist, and does it match what we would
+  generate now?). This is a real design divergence, explored in 003.
+- Its exclusive-app machinery (backfill/overwrite) and proxy-takeover
+  snapshot/restore solve problems opencodex does not have; neither needs
+  porting.