Rename SplicePending and SpliceFailed events

Rename Event::SplicePending to Event::SpliceNegotiated and
Event::SpliceFailed to Event::SpliceNegotiationFailed. These names
better reflect the per-round semantics: each negotiation attempt
resolves to one of these two outcomes, independent of the overall
splice lifecycle.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>

Author: jkczyz

fuzz/src/chanmon_consistency.rs

@@ -2015,7 +2015,7 @@ pub fn do_test<Out: Output + MaybeSend + MaybeSync>(data: &[u8], out: Out) {
 								)
 								.unwrap();
 						},
-						events::Event::SplicePending { new_funding_txo, .. } => {
+						events::Event::SpliceNegotiated { new_funding_txo, .. } => {
 							let broadcaster = match $node {
 								0 => &broadcast_a,
 								1 => &broadcast_b,
@@ -2027,7 +2027,7 @@ pub fn do_test<Out: Output + MaybeSend + MaybeSync>(data: &[u8], out: Out) {
 							assert_eq!(new_funding_txo.txid, splice_tx.compute_txid());
 							chain_state.confirm_tx(splice_tx);
 						},
-						events::Event::SpliceFailed { .. } => {},
+						events::Event::SpliceNegotiationFailed { .. } => {},
 						events::Event::DiscardFunding {
 							funding_info: events::FundingInfo::Contribution { .. },
 							..

fuzz/src/full_stack.rs

@@ -1141,10 +1141,10 @@ pub fn do_test(mut data: &[u8], logger: &Arc<dyn Logger + MaybeSend + MaybeSync>
 						signed_tx,
 					);
 				},
-				Event::SplicePending { .. } => {
+				Event::SpliceNegotiated { .. } => {
 					// Splice negotiation completed, waiting for confirmation
 				},
-				Event::SpliceFailed { .. } => {
+				Event::SpliceNegotiationFailed { .. } => {
 					// Splice failed, inputs can be re-spent
 				},
 				Event::OpenChannelRequest {

lightning/src/events/mod.rs

@@ -1601,8 +1601,8 @@ pub enum Event {
 	/// # Failure Behavior and Persistence
 	/// This event will eventually be replayed after failures-to-handle (i.e., the event handler
 	/// returning `Err(ReplayEvent ())`) and will be persisted across restarts.
-	SplicePending {
-		/// The `channel_id` of the channel that has a pending splice funding transaction.
+	SpliceNegotiated {
+		/// The `channel_id` of the channel with the negotiated splice funding transaction.
 		channel_id: ChannelId,
 		/// The `user_channel_id` value passed in to [`ChannelManager::create_channel`] for outbound
 		/// channels, or to [`ChannelManager::accept_inbound_channel`] for inbound channels.
@@ -1622,7 +1622,7 @@ pub enum Event {
 	},
 	/// Used to indicate that a splice negotiation round for the given `channel_id` has failed.
 	///
-	/// Each splice attempt (initial or RBF) resolves to either [`Event::SplicePending`] on
+	/// Each splice attempt (initial or RBF) resolves to either [`Event::SpliceNegotiated`] on
 	/// success or this event on failure. Prior successfully negotiated splice transactions are
 	/// unaffected.
 	///
@@ -1632,7 +1632,7 @@ pub enum Event {
 	/// # Failure Behavior and Persistence
 	/// This event will eventually be replayed after failures-to-handle (i.e., the event handler
 	/// returning `Err(ReplayEvent ())`) and will be persisted across restarts.
-	SpliceFailed {
+	SpliceNegotiationFailed {
 		/// The `channel_id` of the channel for which the splice negotiation round failed.
 		channel_id: ChannelId,
 		/// The `user_channel_id` value passed in to [`ChannelManager::create_channel`] for outbound
@@ -2423,7 +2423,7 @@ impl Writeable for Event {
 				// We never write out FundingTransactionReadyForSigning events as they will be regenerated when
 				// necessary.
 			},
-			&Event::SplicePending {
+			&Event::SpliceNegotiated {
 				ref channel_id,
 				ref user_channel_id,
 				ref counterparty_node_id,
@@ -2441,7 +2441,7 @@ impl Writeable for Event {
 					(11, new_funding_redeem_script, required),
 				});
 			},
-			&Event::SpliceFailed {
+			&Event::SpliceNegotiationFailed {
 				ref channel_id,
 				ref user_channel_id,
 				ref counterparty_node_id,
@@ -3080,7 +3080,7 @@ impl MaybeReadable for Event {
 						(11, new_funding_redeem_script, required),
 					});
 
-					Ok(Some(Event::SplicePending {
+					Ok(Some(Event::SpliceNegotiated {
 						channel_id: channel_id.0.unwrap(),
 						user_channel_id: user_channel_id.0.unwrap(),
 						counterparty_node_id: counterparty_node_id.0.unwrap(),
@@ -3101,7 +3101,7 @@ impl MaybeReadable for Event {
 						(13, contribution, option),
 					});
 
-					Ok(Some(Event::SpliceFailed {
+					Ok(Some(Event::SpliceNegotiationFailed {
 						channel_id: channel_id.0.unwrap(),
 						user_channel_id: user_channel_id.0.unwrap(),
 						counterparty_node_id: counterparty_node_id.0.unwrap(),

lightning/src/ln/async_signer_tests.rs

@@ -1647,8 +1647,8 @@ fn test_async_splice_initial_commit_sig() {
 		get_event_msg!(initiator, MessageSendEvent::SendTxSignatures, acceptor_node_id);
 	acceptor.node.handle_tx_signatures(initiator_node_id, &tx_signatures);
 
-	let _ = get_event!(initiator, Event::SplicePending);
-	let _ = get_event!(acceptor, Event::SplicePending);
+	let _ = get_event!(initiator, Event::SpliceNegotiated);
+	let _ = get_event!(acceptor, Event::SpliceNegotiated);
 }
 
 #[test]
@@ -1739,6 +1739,6 @@ fn test_async_splice_initial_commit_sig_waits_for_monitor_before_tx_signatures()
 		get_event_msg!(initiator, MessageSendEvent::SendTxSignatures, acceptor_node_id);
 	acceptor.node.handle_tx_signatures(initiator_node_id, &tx_signatures);
 
-	let _ = get_event!(initiator, Event::SplicePending);
-	let _ = get_event!(acceptor, Event::SplicePending);
+	let _ = get_event!(initiator, Event::SpliceNegotiated);
+	let _ = get_event!(acceptor, Event::SpliceNegotiated);
 }

lightning/src/ln/channel.rs

@@ -1170,7 +1170,7 @@ pub(super) struct InteractiveTxMsgError {
 	/// The underlying error.
 	pub(super) err: ChannelError,
 	/// If a splice was in progress when processing the message, this contains the splice funding
-	/// information for emitting a `SpliceFailed` event.
+	/// information for emitting a `SpliceNegotiationFailed` event.
 	pub(super) splice_funding_failed: Option<SpliceFundingFailed>,
 	/// Whether we were quiescent when we received the message, and are no longer due to aborting
 	/// the session.
@@ -1258,15 +1258,15 @@ pub(crate) struct ShutdownResult {
 	pub(crate) channel_funding_txo: Option<OutPoint>,
 	pub(crate) last_local_balance_msat: u64,
 	/// If a splice was in progress when the channel was shut down, this contains
-	/// the splice funding information for emitting a SpliceFailed event.
+	/// the splice funding information for emitting a SpliceNegotiationFailed event.
 	pub(crate) splice_funding_failed: Option<SpliceFundingFailed>,
 }
 
 /// The result of a peer disconnection.
 pub(crate) struct DisconnectResult {
 	pub(crate) is_resumable: bool,
 	/// If a splice was in progress when the channel was shut down, this contains
-	/// the splice funding information for emitting a SpliceFailed event.
+	/// the splice funding information for emitting a SpliceNegotiationFailed event.
 	pub(crate) splice_funding_failed: Option<SpliceFundingFailed>,
 }
 
@@ -12306,7 +12306,7 @@ where
 			//
 			// If the in-progress negotiation later fails (e.g., tx_abort), the derived
 			// min_rbf_feerate becomes stale, causing a slightly higher feerate than
-			// necessary. Call splice_channel again after receiving SpliceFailed to get a
+			// necessary. Call splice_channel again after receiving SpliceNegotiationFailed to get a
 			// fresh template without the stale RBF constraint.
 			let prev_feerate =
 				pending_splice.last_funding_feerate_sat_per_1000_weight.or_else(|| {

lightning/src/ln/channelmanager.rs

@@ -4119,7 +4119,7 @@ impl<
 								None,
 							));
 							pending_events.push_back((
-								events::Event::SpliceFailed {
+								events::Event::SpliceNegotiationFailed {
 									channel_id: *chan_id,
 									counterparty_node_id: *counterparty_node_id,
 									user_channel_id: chan.context().get_user_id(),
@@ -4425,7 +4425,7 @@ impl<
 					None,
 				));
 				pending_events.push_back((
-					events::Event::SpliceFailed {
+					events::Event::SpliceNegotiationFailed {
 						channel_id: shutdown_res.channel_id,
 						counterparty_node_id: shutdown_res.counterparty_node_id,
 						user_channel_id: shutdown_res.user_channel_id,
@@ -4931,7 +4931,7 @@ impl<
 							None,
 						));
 						pending_events.push_back((
-							events::Event::SpliceFailed {
+							events::Event::SpliceNegotiationFailed {
 								channel_id: *channel_id,
 								counterparty_node_id: *counterparty_node_id,
 								user_channel_id: chan.context.get_user_id(),
@@ -6629,7 +6629,7 @@ impl<
 					));
 				}
 				pending_events.push_back((
-					events::Event::SpliceFailed {
+					events::Event::SpliceNegotiationFailed {
 						channel_id,
 						counterparty_node_id,
 						user_channel_id,
@@ -6675,14 +6675,14 @@ impl<
 	/// # Events
 	///
 	/// Calling this method will commence the process of creating a new funding transaction for the
-	/// channel. Once the funding transaction has been constructed, an [`Event::SplicePending`]
+	/// channel. Once the funding transaction has been constructed, an [`Event::SpliceNegotiated`]
 	/// will be emitted. At this point, any inputs contributed to the splice can only be re-spent
 	/// if an [`Event::DiscardFunding`] is seen.
 	///
-	/// If any failures occur while negotiating the funding transaction, an [`Event::SpliceFailed`]
-	/// will be emitted. Any contributed inputs no longer used will be included in an
-	/// [`Event::DiscardFunding`] and thus can be re-spent. If a [`FundingTemplate`] was obtained
-	/// while a previous splice was still being negotiated, its
+	/// If any failures occur while negotiating the funding transaction, an
+	/// [`Event::SpliceNegotiationFailed`] will be emitted. Any contributed inputs no longer used
+	/// will be included in an [`Event::DiscardFunding`] and thus can be re-spent. If a
+	/// [`FundingTemplate`] was obtained while a previous splice was still being negotiated, its
 	/// [`min_rbf_feerate`][FundingTemplate::min_rbf_feerate] may be stale after the failure.
 	/// Call [`ChannelManager::splice_channel`] again to get a fresh template.
 	///
@@ -6901,7 +6901,7 @@ impl<
 							}
 							if let Some(splice_negotiated) = splice_negotiated {
 								self.pending_events.lock().unwrap().push_back((
-									events::Event::SplicePending {
+									events::Event::SpliceNegotiated {
 										channel_id: *channel_id,
 										counterparty_node_id: *counterparty_node_id,
 										user_channel_id: chan.context().get_user_id(),
@@ -10994,7 +10994,7 @@ This indicates a bug inside LDK. Please report this error at https://github.com/
 				.and_then(|v| v.splice_negotiated.take())
 			{
 				pending_events.push_back((
-					events::Event::SplicePending {
+					events::Event::SpliceNegotiated {
 						channel_id: channel.context.channel_id(),
 						counterparty_node_id,
 						user_channel_id: channel.context.get_user_id(),
@@ -11864,7 +11864,7 @@ This indicates a bug inside LDK. Please report this error at https://github.com/
 								None,
 							));
 							pending_events.push_back((
-								events::Event::SpliceFailed {
+								events::Event::SpliceNegotiationFailed {
 									channel_id,
 									counterparty_node_id: *counterparty_node_id,
 									user_channel_id: channel.context().get_user_id(),
@@ -12025,7 +12025,7 @@ This indicates a bug inside LDK. Please report this error at https://github.com/
 								None,
 							));
 							pending_events.push_back((
-								events::Event::SpliceFailed {
+								events::Event::SpliceNegotiationFailed {
 									channel_id: msg.channel_id,
 									counterparty_node_id,
 									user_channel_id: chan.context().get_user_id(),
@@ -12112,7 +12112,7 @@ This indicates a bug inside LDK. Please report this error at https://github.com/
 							let exited_quiescence = splice_negotiated.is_some();
 							if let Some(splice_negotiated) = splice_negotiated {
 								self.pending_events.lock().unwrap().push_back((
-									events::Event::SplicePending {
+									events::Event::SpliceNegotiated {
 										channel_id: msg.channel_id,
 										counterparty_node_id: *counterparty_node_id,
 										user_channel_id: chan.context.get_user_id(),
@@ -12195,7 +12195,7 @@ This indicates a bug inside LDK. Please report this error at https://github.com/
 							None,
 						));
 						pending_events.push_back((
-							events::Event::SpliceFailed {
+							events::Event::SpliceNegotiationFailed {
 								channel_id: msg.channel_id,
 								counterparty_node_id: *counterparty_node_id,
 								user_channel_id: chan_entry.get().context().get_user_id(),
@@ -12343,7 +12343,7 @@ This indicates a bug inside LDK. Please report this error at https://github.com/
 								None,
 							));
 							pending_events.push_back((
-								events::Event::SpliceFailed {
+								events::Event::SpliceNegotiationFailed {
 									channel_id: msg.channel_id,
 									counterparty_node_id: *counterparty_node_id,
 									user_channel_id: chan.context().get_user_id(),
@@ -15456,7 +15456,7 @@ impl<
 									outputs: splice_funding_failed.contributed_outputs,
 								},
 							});
-							splice_failed_events.push(events::Event::SpliceFailed {
+							splice_failed_events.push(events::Event::SpliceNegotiationFailed {
 								channel_id: chan.context().channel_id(),
 								counterparty_node_id,
 								user_channel_id: chan.context().get_user_id(),
@@ -18112,8 +18112,9 @@ impl<
 		let our_pending_intercepts = self.pending_intercepted_htlcs.lock().unwrap();
 
 		// Since some FundingNegotiation variants are not persisted, any splice in such state must
-		// be failed upon reload. However, as the necessary information for the SpliceFailed and
-		// DiscardFunding events is not persisted, the events need to be persisted even though they
+		// be failed upon reload. However, as the necessary information for the
+		// SpliceNegotiationFailed and DiscardFunding events is not persisted, the events need to
+		// be persisted even though they
 		// haven't been emitted yet. These are removed after the events are written.
 		let mut events = self.pending_events.lock().unwrap();
 		let event_count = events.len();
@@ -18131,7 +18132,7 @@ impl<
 						None,
 					));
 					events.push_back((
-						events::Event::SpliceFailed {
+						events::Event::SpliceNegotiationFailed {
 							channel_id: chan.context.channel_id(),
 							counterparty_node_id: chan.context.get_counterparty_node_id(),
 							user_channel_id: chan.context.get_user_id(),
@@ -18260,7 +18261,7 @@ impl<
 			(23, self.best_block.read().unwrap().previous_blocks, required),
 		});
 
-		// Remove the SpliceFailed and DiscardFunding events added earlier.
+		// Remove the SpliceNegotiationFailed and DiscardFunding events added earlier.
 		events.truncate(event_count);
 
 		Ok(())

lightning/src/ln/functional_test_utils.rs

@@ -2389,7 +2389,7 @@ pub fn check_closed_events(node: &Node, expected_close_events: &[ExpectedCloseEv
 		discard_events_count
 	);
 	assert_eq!(
-		events.iter().filter(|e| matches!(e, Event::SpliceFailed { .. },)).count(),
+		events.iter().filter(|e| matches!(e, Event::SpliceNegotiationFailed { .. },)).count(),
 		splice_events_count
 	);
 }
@@ -3232,7 +3232,7 @@ pub fn expect_splice_pending_event<'a, 'b, 'c, 'd>(
 	let events = node.node.get_and_clear_pending_events();
 	assert_eq!(events.len(), 1);
 	match &events[0] {
-		crate::events::Event::SplicePending { channel_id, counterparty_node_id, .. } => {
+		crate::events::Event::SpliceNegotiated { channel_id, counterparty_node_id, .. } => {
 			assert_eq!(*expected_counterparty_node_id, *counterparty_node_id);
 			*channel_id
 		},
@@ -3261,7 +3261,7 @@ pub fn expect_splice_failed_events<'a, 'b, 'c, 'd>(
 		_ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
 	}
 	match &events[1] {
-		Event::SpliceFailed { channel_id, reason, contribution, .. } => {
+		Event::SpliceNegotiationFailed { channel_id, reason, contribution, .. } => {
 			assert_eq!(*expected_channel_id, *channel_id);
 			assert_eq!(*reason, expected_reason);
 			assert_eq!(contribution.as_ref(), Some(&funding_contribution));

lightning/src/ln/funding.rs

@@ -120,10 +120,10 @@ pub enum FundingContributionError {
 	///
 	/// Note: [`FundingTemplate::min_rbf_feerate`] may be derived from an in-progress
 	/// negotiation that later aborts, leaving a stale (higher than necessary) minimum. If
-	/// this error occurs after receiving [`Event::SpliceFailed`], call
+	/// this error occurs after receiving [`Event::SpliceNegotiationFailed`], call
 	/// [`ChannelManager::splice_channel`] again to get a fresh template.
 	///
-	/// [`Event::SpliceFailed`]: crate::events::Event::SpliceFailed
+	/// [`Event::SpliceNegotiationFailed`]: crate::events::Event::SpliceNegotiationFailed
 	/// [`ChannelManager::splice_channel`]: crate::ln::channelmanager::ChannelManager::splice_channel
 	FeeRateBelowRbfMinimum {
 		/// The requested feerate.