Skip to content

[0.1-bindings] Merge 0.1.11 into 0.1-bindings#4749

Merged
TheBlueMatt merged 7 commits into
lightningdevkit:0.1-bindingsfrom
TheBlueMatt:2026-06-0.1.11-bindings
Jun 26, 2026
Merged

[0.1-bindings] Merge 0.1.11 into 0.1-bindings#4749
TheBlueMatt merged 7 commits into
lightningdevkit:0.1-bindingsfrom
TheBlueMatt:2026-06-0.1.11-bindings

Conversation

@TheBlueMatt

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

No description provided.

TheBlueMatt and others added 7 commits June 23, 2026 00:22
8a39057 broke MSRV for 0.1 which
is still 1.63. We fix it here.
v0.1.11 - Jun 24, 2026 - "CI Matters"

Bug Fixes
=========

 * 0.1.10 broke the MSRV of the `lightning` crate, which now again compiles on
   `rustc` 1.63 (lightningdevkit#4737).
@ldk-reviews-bot

ldk-reviews-bot commented Jun 25, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

I've assigned @wpaulino as a reviewer!
I'll wait for their review and will help manage the review process.
Once they submit their review, I'll check if a second reviewer would be helpful.

@ldk-claude-review-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

This is a merge PR of the released 0.1.11 tag into the 0.1-bindings branch. The changes are CI dependency pins, version bump, changelog, and MSRV-compatibility refactors.

The chainmonitor.rs change replacing is_some_and(...) with .map(...).unwrap_or(false) is functionally equivalent (and needed since is_some_and requires rustc 1.70+). The import removals in offers_tests.rs and peer_handler.rs are cleanup of unused imports. The CI pins follow the existing established pattern.

No issues found.

@ldk-reviews-bot ldk-reviews-bot requested a review from wpaulino June 25, 2026 16:43
@ldk-reviews-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown

👋 The first review has been submitted!

Do you think this PR is ready for a second reviewer? If so, click here to assign a second reviewer.

@TheBlueMatt TheBlueMatt merged commit 8dae241 into lightningdevkit:0.1-bindings Jun 26, 2026
9 of 26 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants