LCORE-1652: Add release candidates versions#1772
Conversation
|
Warning Rate limit exceeded
You’ve run out of usage credits. Purchase more in the billing tab. ⌛ How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. 🚦 How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our FAQ for further information. ℹ️ Review info⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml Review profile: ASSERTIVE Plan: Pro Run ID: 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
WalkthroughThe supported versions documentation is updated to include two prerelease version entries: ChangesSupported Versions Documentation
Estimated code review effort🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~3 minutes 🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 5✅ Passed checks (5 passed)
✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings. ✨ Finishing Touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
✨ Simplify code
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the
rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.
Inline comments:
In `@docs/versions_supported.md`:
- Around line 8-10: The status values for the versions are inconsistent: update
the status column for the rows with identifiers "0.6.0", "0.6.0rc1", and
"0.6.0rc2" so they reflect a consistent lifecycle model (either mark the
released final "0.6.0" as "Current" and both "0.6.0rc1" and "0.6.0rc2" as
"Past/Archived"/"Deprecated", or if RCs are still active mark "0.6.0" as
"Future" and set the RC rows to "Current"/"Active"); change the status strings
in the table accordingly to match your chosen model.
- Around line 9-10: The release candidate dates are ordered incorrectly: ensure
that "0.6.0rc1" and "0.6.0rc2" are scheduled before the final "0.6.0" date by
updating their date values in the table (e.g., move 0.6.0rc1 to an earlier date
than the final, set 0.6.0rc2 between rc1 and the final release), so the sequence
is rc1 → rc2 → 0.6.0; update the date strings for the rows containing
"0.6.0rc1", "0.6.0rc2", and "0.6.0" accordingly.
🪄 Autofix (Beta)
Fix all unresolved CodeRabbit comments on this PR:
- Push a commit to this branch (recommended)
- Create a new PR with the fixes
ℹ️ Review info
⚙️ Run configuration
Configuration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
Plan: Pro
Run ID: 5643af63-cfb8-4a3f-b76d-a700a1ec8fb6
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
docs/versions_supported.md
📜 Review details
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (17)
- GitHub Check: build-pr
- GitHub Check: unit_tests (3.12)
- GitHub Check: unit_tests (3.13)
- GitHub Check: pydocstyle
- GitHub Check: radon
- GitHub Check: list_outdated_dependencies
- GitHub Check: Pylinter
- GitHub Check: spectral
- GitHub Check: integration_tests (3.12)
- GitHub Check: E2E: server mode / ci / group 3
- GitHub Check: E2E: server mode / ci / group 1
- GitHub Check: E2E: server mode / ci / group 2
- GitHub Check: E2E: library mode / ci / group 3
- GitHub Check: E2E Tests for Lightspeed Evaluation job
- GitHub Check: E2E: library mode / ci / group 2
- GitHub Check: E2E: library mode / ci / group 1
- GitHub Check: Konflux kflux-prd-rh02 / lightspeed-stack-on-pull-request
2021898 to
3406120
Compare
Description
LCORE-1652: Add release candidates versions
Type of change
Tools used to create PR
Related Tickets & Documents
Summary by CodeRabbit