Skip to content

chore(deps): bump lightship from 6.8.0 to 9.0.3#764

Closed
dependabot[bot] wants to merge 5 commits into
mainfrom
dependabot/npm_and_yarn/lightship-9.0.3
Closed

chore(deps): bump lightship from 6.8.0 to 9.0.3#764
dependabot[bot] wants to merge 5 commits into
mainfrom
dependabot/npm_and_yarn/lightship-9.0.3

Conversation

@dependabot
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@dependabot dependabot Bot commented on behalf of github Jun 25, 2025

Dependabot compatibility score

You can trigger a rebase of this PR by commenting @dependabot rebase.


Dependabot commands and options

You can trigger Dependabot actions by commenting on this PR:

  • @dependabot rebase will rebase this PR
  • @dependabot recreate will recreate this PR, overwriting any edits that have been made to it
  • @dependabot merge will merge this PR after your CI passes on it
  • @dependabot squash and merge will squash and merge this PR after your CI passes on it
  • @dependabot cancel merge will cancel a previously requested merge and block automerging
  • @dependabot reopen will reopen this PR if it is closed
  • @dependabot close will close this PR and stop Dependabot recreating it. You can achieve the same result by closing it manually
  • @dependabot show <dependency name> ignore conditions will show all of the ignore conditions of the specified dependency
  • @dependabot ignore this major version will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this major version (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)
  • @dependabot ignore this minor version will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this minor version (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)
  • @dependabot ignore this dependency will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this dependency (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)

Note
Automatic rebases have been disabled on this pull request as it has been open for over 30 days.

---
updated-dependencies:
- dependency-name: lightship
  dependency-version: 9.0.3
  dependency-type: direct:production
  update-type: version-update:semver-major
...

Signed-off-by: dependabot[bot] <support@github.com>
@dependabot @github
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

dependabot Bot commented on behalf of github Jun 25, 2025

Labels

The following labels could not be found: dependabot. Please create it before Dependabot can add it to a pull request.

Please fix the above issues or remove invalid values from dependabot.yml.

@dependabot dependabot Bot added the dependencies Pull requests that update a dependency file label Jun 25, 2025
@dependabot dependabot Bot added the dependencies Pull requests that update a dependency file label Jun 25, 2025
@github-actions
Copy link
Copy Markdown

github-actions Bot commented Jun 25, 2025

Coverage report

Caution

Test run failed

St.
Category Percentage Covered / Total
🟡 Statements
60.2% (+9.65% 🔼)
829/1377
🔴 Branches
43.32% (+8.04% 🔼)
172/397
🔴 Functions
52.82% (+10.27% 🔼)
159/301
🟡 Lines
60.55% (+9.61% 🔼)
749/1237
Show files with reduced coverage 🔻
St.
File Statements Branches Functions Lines
🟡 error.ts
64.52% (-12.9% 🔻)
100%
33.33% (-22.22% 🔻)
63.33% (-13.33% 🔻)
🟡
... / TeamConfigService.ts
71.3% (-0.45% 🔻)
58.93% (-1.79% 🔻)
69.47% (-1.05% 🔻)
70.1% (-0.52% 🔻)
🔴 utils/manifests.ts
58.82% (-23.53% 🔻)
40% (-30% 🔻)
33.33% (-50% 🔻)
58.82% (-23.53% 🔻)
🔴 authz.ts
44.51% (-41.46% 🔻)
22.81% (-45.61% 🔻)
41.03% (-48.72% 🔻)
45% (-44.29% 🔻)
🔴 utils.ts
44.7% (-15.91% 🔻)
13.11% (-21.31% 🔻)
12.5% (-28.13% 🔻)
43.93% (-17.76% 🔻)
🟡
... / RepoService.ts
71.56% (-10.09% 🔻)
68.42% (-5.26% 🔻)
50.98% (-15.69% 🔻)
77.55% (-10.2% 🔻)

Test suite run failed

Failed tests: 0/194. Failed suites: 4/12.
  ● Test suite failed to run

    Jest encountered an unexpected token

    Jest failed to parse a file. This happens e.g. when your code or its dependencies use non-standard JavaScript syntax, or when Jest is not configured to support such syntax.

    Out of the box Jest supports Babel, which will be used to transform your files into valid JS based on your Babel configuration.

    By default "node_modules" folder is ignored by transformers.

    Here's what you can do:
     • If you are trying to use ECMAScript Modules, see https://jestjs.io/docs/ecmascript-modules for how to enable it.
     • If you are trying to use TypeScript, see https://jestjs.io/docs/getting-started#using-typescript
     • To have some of your "node_modules" files transformed, you can specify a custom "transformIgnorePatterns" in your config.
     • If you need a custom transformation specify a "transform" option in your config.
     • If you simply want to mock your non-JS modules (e.g. binary assets) you can stub them out with the "moduleNameMapper" config option.

    You'll find more details and examples of these config options in the docs:
    https://jestjs.io/docs/configuration
    For information about custom transformations, see:
    https://jestjs.io/docs/code-transformation

    Details:

    /home/runner/work/apl-api/apl-api/node_modules/serialize-error/index.js:1
    ({"Object.<anonymous>":function(module,exports,require,__dirname,__filename,jest){import errorConstructors from './error-constructors.js';
                                                                                      ^^^^^^

    SyntaxError: Cannot use import statement outside a module

       6 | import { initialize } from 'express-openapi'
       7 | import { Server } from 'http'
    >  8 | import { createLightship } from 'lightship'
         | ^
       9 | import logger from 'morgan'
      10 | import path from 'path'
      11 | import { CleanOptions } from 'simple-git'

      at Runtime.createScriptFromCode (node_modules/jest-runtime/build/index.js:1505:14)
      at Object.<anonymous> (node_modules/lightship/dist/cjs/factories/createLightship.js:14:27)
      at Object.<anonymous> (node_modules/lightship/dist/cjs/index.js:4:28)
      at Object.<anonymous> (src/app.ts:8:1)
      at Object.<anonymous> (src/otomi-stack.ts:10:1)
      at Object.<anonymous> (src/otomi-stack.test.ts:12:1)


  ● Test suite failed to run

    Jest encountered an unexpected token

    Jest failed to parse a file. This happens e.g. when your code or its dependencies use non-standard JavaScript syntax, or when Jest is not configured to support such syntax.

    Out of the box Jest supports Babel, which will be used to transform your files into valid JS based on your Babel configuration.

    By default "node_modules" folder is ignored by transformers.

    Here's what you can do:
     • If you are trying to use ECMAScript Modules, see https://jestjs.io/docs/ecmascript-modules for how to enable it.
     • If you are trying to use TypeScript, see https://jestjs.io/docs/getting-started#using-typescript
     • To have some of your "node_modules" files transformed, you can specify a custom "transformIgnorePatterns" in your config.
     • If you need a custom transformation specify a "transform" option in your config.
     • If you simply want to mock your non-JS modules (e.g. binary assets) you can stub them out with the "moduleNameMapper" config option.

    You'll find more details and examples of these config options in the docs:
    https://jestjs.io/docs/configuration
    For information about custom transformations, see:
    https://jestjs.io/docs/code-transformation

    Details:

    /home/runner/work/apl-api/apl-api/node_modules/serialize-error/index.js:1
    ({"Object.<anonymous>":function(module,exports,require,__dirname,__filename,jest){import errorConstructors from './error-constructors.js';
                                                                                      ^^^^^^

    SyntaxError: Cannot use import statement outside a module

       6 | import { initialize } from 'express-openapi'
       7 | import { Server } from 'http'
    >  8 | import { createLightship } from 'lightship'
         | ^
       9 | import logger from 'morgan'
      10 | import path from 'path'
      11 | import { CleanOptions } from 'simple-git'

      at Runtime.createScriptFromCode (node_modules/jest-runtime/build/index.js:1505:14)
      at Object.<anonymous> (node_modules/lightship/dist/cjs/factories/createLightship.js:14:27)
      at Object.<anonymous> (node_modules/lightship/dist/cjs/index.js:4:28)
      at Object.<anonymous> (src/app.ts:8:1)
      at Object.<anonymous> (src/api.authz.test.ts:3:1)


  ● Test suite failed to run

    Jest encountered an unexpected token

    Jest failed to parse a file. This happens e.g. when your code or its dependencies use non-standard JavaScript syntax, or when Jest is not configured to support such syntax.

    Out of the box Jest supports Babel, which will be used to transform your files into valid JS based on your Babel configuration.

    By default "node_modules" folder is ignored by transformers.

    Here's what you can do:
     • If you are trying to use ECMAScript Modules, see https://jestjs.io/docs/ecmascript-modules for how to enable it.
     • If you are trying to use TypeScript, see https://jestjs.io/docs/getting-started#using-typescript
     • To have some of your "node_modules" files transformed, you can specify a custom "transformIgnorePatterns" in your config.
     • If you need a custom transformation specify a "transform" option in your config.
     • If you simply want to mock your non-JS modules (e.g. binary assets) you can stub them out with the "moduleNameMapper" config option.

    You'll find more details and examples of these config options in the docs:
    https://jestjs.io/docs/configuration
    For information about custom transformations, see:
    https://jestjs.io/docs/code-transformation

    Details:

    /home/runner/work/apl-api/apl-api/node_modules/serialize-error/index.js:1
    ({"Object.<anonymous>":function(module,exports,require,__dirname,__filename,jest){import errorConstructors from './error-constructors.js';
                                                                                      ^^^^^^

    SyntaxError: Cannot use import statement outside a module

       6 | import { initialize } from 'express-openapi'
       7 | import { Server } from 'http'
    >  8 | import { createLightship } from 'lightship'
         | ^
       9 | import logger from 'morgan'
      10 | import path from 'path'
      11 | import { CleanOptions } from 'simple-git'

      at Runtime.createScriptFromCode (node_modules/jest-runtime/build/index.js:1505:14)
      at Object.<anonymous> (node_modules/lightship/dist/cjs/factories/createLightship.js:14:27)
      at Object.<anonymous> (node_modules/lightship/dist/cjs/index.js:4:28)
      at Object.<anonymous> (src/app.ts:8:1)
      at Object.<anonymous> (src/otomi-stack.ts:10:1)
      at Object.<anonymous> (src/middleware/jwt.test.ts:2:1)


  ● Test suite failed to run

    Jest encountered an unexpected token

    Jest failed to parse a file. This happens e.g. when your code or its dependencies use non-standard JavaScript syntax, or when Jest is not configured to support such syntax.

    Out of the box Jest supports Babel, which will be used to transform your files into valid JS based on your Babel configuration.

    By default "node_modules" folder is ignored by transformers.

    Here's what you can do:
     • If you are trying to use ECMAScript Modules, see https://jestjs.io/docs/ecmascript-modules for how to enable it.
     • If you are trying to use TypeScript, see https://jestjs.io/docs/getting-started#using-typescript
     • To have some of your "node_modules" files transformed, you can specify a custom "transformIgnorePatterns" in your config.
     • If you need a custom transformation specify a "transform" option in your config.
     • If you simply want to mock your non-JS modules (e.g. binary assets) you can stub them out with the "moduleNameMapper" config option.

    You'll find more details and examples of these config options in the docs:
    https://jestjs.io/docs/configuration
    For information about custom transformations, see:
    https://jestjs.io/docs/code-transformation

    Details:

    /home/runner/work/apl-api/apl-api/node_modules/serialize-error/index.js:1
    ({"Object.<anonymous>":function(module,exports,require,__dirname,__filename,jest){import errorConstructors from './error-constructors.js';
                                                                                      ^^^^^^

    SyntaxError: Cannot use import statement outside a module

       6 | import { initialize } from 'express-openapi'
       7 | import { Server } from 'http'
    >  8 | import { createLightship } from 'lightship'
         | ^
       9 | import logger from 'morgan'
      10 | import path from 'path'
      11 | import { CleanOptions } from 'simple-git'

      at Runtime.createScriptFromCode (node_modules/jest-runtime/build/index.js:1505:14)
      at Object.<anonymous> (node_modules/lightship/dist/cjs/factories/createLightship.js:14:27)
      at Object.<anonymous> (node_modules/lightship/dist/cjs/index.js:4:28)
      at Object.<anonymous> (src/app.ts:8:1)
      at Object.<anonymous> (src/api.test.ts:4:1)

Report generated by 🧪jest coverage report action from 5a91668

@CasLubbers
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

lightship 9.0.3 does not build valid commonjs

@CasLubbers CasLubbers closed this Nov 3, 2025
@dependabot @github
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

dependabot Bot commented on behalf of github Nov 3, 2025

OK, I won't notify you again about this release, but will get in touch when a new version is available. If you'd rather skip all updates until the next major or minor version, let me know by commenting @dependabot ignore this major version or @dependabot ignore this minor version. You can also ignore all major, minor, or patch releases for a dependency by adding an ignore condition with the desired update_types to your config file.

If you change your mind, just re-open this PR and I'll resolve any conflicts on it.

@dependabot dependabot Bot deleted the dependabot/npm_and_yarn/lightship-9.0.3 branch November 3, 2025 11:07
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

dependencies Pull requests that update a dependency file

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants