Skip to content

fix: correct icon image update logic#483

Merged
18202781743 merged 1 commit into
linuxdeepin:masterfrom
18202781743:master
May 14, 2025
Merged

fix: correct icon image update logic#483
18202781743 merged 1 commit into
linuxdeepin:masterfrom
18202781743:master

Conversation

@18202781743

@18202781743 18202781743 commented May 14, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor
  1. Changed from direct init() call to maybeUpdateUrl() when name is set
  2. This ensures proper URL update handling when the icon name changes
  3. Fixes potential cases where icon wouldn't update correctly after
    name change
  4. Maintains consistency with the component's update behavior

fix: 修正图标图片更新逻辑

  1. 将直接调用 init() 改为调用 maybeUpdateUrl() 当名称被设置时
  2. 确保当图标名称改变时能正确处理URL更新
  3. 修复了名称改变后图标可能无法正确更新的情况
  4. 保持与组件更新行为的一致性

pms: BUG-311021

Summary by Sourcery

Bug Fixes:

  • Use maybeUpdateUrl() instead of init() in DQuickIconImage::setName to ensure proper URL updates when the icon name changes.

1. Changed from direct init() call to maybeUpdateUrl() when name is set
2. This ensures proper URL update handling when the icon name changes
3. Fixes potential cases where icon wouldn't update correctly after
name change
4. Maintains consistency with the component's update behavior

fix: 修正图标图片更新逻辑

1. 将直接调用 init() 改为调用 maybeUpdateUrl() 当名称被设置时
2. 确保当图标名称改变时能正确处理URL更新
3. 修复了名称改变后图标可能无法正确更新的情况
4. 保持与组件更新行为的一致性

pms: BUG-311021
@18202781743 18202781743 requested review from BLumia and mhduiy May 14, 2025 06:31
deepin-ci-robot added a commit to linuxdeepin/dtk6declarative that referenced this pull request May 14, 2025
Synchronize source files from linuxdeepin/dtkdeclarative.

Source-pull-request: linuxdeepin/dtkdeclarative#483
@deepin-ci-robot

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

deepin pr auto review

关键摘要:

  • 代码修改将 d->init(); 改为 d->maybeUpdateUrl();,需要确认这一改动是否符合功能需求。

是否建议立即修改:

  • 否,但需要进一步确认 maybeUpdateUrl() 方法是否实现了 init() 方法所完成的功能。如果 maybeUpdateUrl() 已经包含了 init() 的所有逻辑,那么这个改动是合理的。如果 maybeUpdateUrl() 没有实现 init() 的所有逻辑,那么需要重新评估这个改动。

@sourcery-ai sourcery-ai Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hey @18202781743 - I've reviewed your changes and they look great!

Here's what I looked at during the review
  • 🟢 General issues: all looks good
  • 🟢 Security: all looks good
  • 🟢 Testing: all looks good
  • 🟢 Complexity: all looks good
  • 🟢 Documentation: all looks good

Sourcery is free for open source - if you like our reviews please consider sharing them ✨
Help me be more useful! Please click 👍 or 👎 on each comment and I'll use the feedback to improve your reviews.

@sourcery-ai

sourcery-ai Bot commented May 14, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Reviewer's Guide

Replaced direct initialization with a conditional URL updater in the icon’s name setter to ensure the image source is refreshed correctly when the icon name changes, maintaining consistency with the component’s update behavior.

File-Level Changes

Change Details Files
Switch from init() to maybeUpdateUrl() in setName() for proper URL updates
  • Replaced direct init() call with maybeUpdateUrl()
  • Guarded URL update on component completion
  • Ensured icon image refresh after name change
src/private/dquickiconimage.cpp

Tips and commands

Interacting with Sourcery

  • Trigger a new review: Comment @sourcery-ai review on the pull request.
  • Continue discussions: Reply directly to Sourcery's review comments.
  • Generate a GitHub issue from a review comment: Ask Sourcery to create an
    issue from a review comment by replying to it. You can also reply to a
    review comment with @sourcery-ai issue to create an issue from it.
  • Generate a pull request title: Write @sourcery-ai anywhere in the pull
    request title to generate a title at any time. You can also comment
    @sourcery-ai title on the pull request to (re-)generate the title at any time.
  • Generate a pull request summary: Write @sourcery-ai summary anywhere in
    the pull request body to generate a PR summary at any time exactly where you
    want it. You can also comment @sourcery-ai summary on the pull request to
    (re-)generate the summary at any time.
  • Generate reviewer's guide: Comment @sourcery-ai guide on the pull
    request to (re-)generate the reviewer's guide at any time.
  • Resolve all Sourcery comments: Comment @sourcery-ai resolve on the
    pull request to resolve all Sourcery comments. Useful if you've already
    addressed all the comments and don't want to see them anymore.
  • Dismiss all Sourcery reviews: Comment @sourcery-ai dismiss on the pull
    request to dismiss all existing Sourcery reviews. Especially useful if you
    want to start fresh with a new review - don't forget to comment
    @sourcery-ai review to trigger a new review!

Customizing Your Experience

Access your dashboard to:

  • Enable or disable review features such as the Sourcery-generated pull request
    summary, the reviewer's guide, and others.
  • Change the review language.
  • Add, remove or edit custom review instructions.
  • Adjust other review settings.

Getting Help

@deepin-ci-robot

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: 18202781743, mhduiy, robertkill

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Details Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@18202781743 18202781743 merged commit 1210222 into linuxdeepin:master May 14, 2025
17 of 21 checks passed
18202781743 pushed a commit to linuxdeepin/dtk6declarative that referenced this pull request May 14, 2025
Synchronize source files from linuxdeepin/dtkdeclarative.

Source-pull-request: linuxdeepin/dtkdeclarative#483
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants