Skip to content

feat: Allow lastore-daemon.service to configure kernel parameters#274

Merged
electricface merged 1 commit into
linuxdeepin:masterfrom
electricface:swt/dev-security1
Dec 29, 2025
Merged

feat: Allow lastore-daemon.service to configure kernel parameters#274
electricface merged 1 commit into
linuxdeepin:masterfrom
electricface:swt/dev-security1

Conversation

@electricface

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@deepin-ci-robot

Copy link
Copy Markdown

deepin pr auto review

我来对这个 git diff 进行审查:

  1. 语法逻辑分析:
  • 修改内容主要是 systemd 服务配置文件的注释和配置项
  • 语法上没有问题,符合 systemd 配置文件规范
  • 注释格式规范,解释清晰
  1. 代码质量:
  • 注释添加得当,解释了为什么移除 ProtectKernelTunables=true
  • 保持了原有注释风格的一致性
  • 注释内容有助于理解配置决策的原因
  1. 代码性能:
  • 这个修改不会直接影响性能
  • 移除 ProtectKernelTunables=true 可能会略微降低安全性,但这是必要的权衡
  1. 代码安全:
  • 移除 ProtectKernelTunables=true 会降低系统安全性
  • 但这个修改是必要的,因为某些软件包在安装过程中需要设置内核参数
  • 注释中已经明确说明了这一安全权衡的原因

改进建议:

  1. 建议在注释中补充说明哪些类型的软件包可能需要设置内核参数,这样可以帮助维护人员更好地理解安全风险
  2. 考虑添加一个 TODO 注释,提醒后续评估是否可以通过其他方式(如使用特定的权限)来限制内核参数的访问
  3. 建议在系统日志中记录相关操作,以便安全审计

修改后的建议版本:

# ProtectKernelTunables=true is not set because some packages (e.g., networking, storage drivers) may need to set kernel parameters during package operations.
# TODO: Consider implementing fine-grained control for kernel parameter access

这个修改是一个合理的权衡,为了支持软件包的正常安装而暂时放宽了一些安全限制。建议后续研究是否可以实现更精细的权限控制,在保证功能的同时提高系统安全性。

@deepin-ci-robot

Copy link
Copy Markdown

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: electricface, zhaohuiw42

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Details Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@electricface electricface merged commit a75793b into linuxdeepin:master Dec 29, 2025
13 of 16 checks passed
@electricface electricface deleted the swt/dev-security1 branch December 29, 2025 05:41
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants