fix open mode inconsistencies#225
Open
mroi wants to merge 1 commit intomachine-drivers:masterfrom
mroi:patch-1
Open
fix open mode inconsistencies#225mroi wants to merge 1 commit intomachine-drivers:masterfrom mroi:patch-1
mroi wants to merge 1 commit intomachine-drivers:masterfrom
mroi:patch-1
Conversation
* checking should be limited to read and write flags * other flags require translation from L9P to system values
10 tasks
dtzWill
pushed a commit
to dtzWill/nixpkgs
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 23, 2020
File modes are not properly translated from L9P to host values. Instead, they are assumed to be identical, which is wrong on macOS. machine-drivers/docker-machine-driver-xhyve#225 (cherry picked from commit 338386b)
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The lib9p filesystem backend currently does not handle open modes properly.
When the guest opens a file with O_RDWR,
check_access()will never find a match, since it only compares againstL9P_OREAD,L9P_OWRITE, andL9P_OEXEC, but not againstL9P_ORDWR. Therefore,check_access()fails, when guests open files withO_RDWR.In addition, the other modes are not translated from L9P to host values. The current implementation assumes, these modes have the same numerical representation in both. But in reality, they don’t.
This may fix #188.
I am aware that this patch will cause this version of
lib9pto diverge from the original. Maybe it would be an alternative to port a more recent version from upstream. But it has changed considerably there, and I do not know, whether the upstream version fixes this problem or whether upstream can be integrated here.