Add note about reduction scope#183
Open
MasonProtter wants to merge 1 commit into
Open
Conversation
Author
|
Bump @mcabbott |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Ref #133 and https://discourse.julialang.org/t/tullio-broadcasting-issue/107321/4. I was pretty surprised by this as well, but it makes sense in retrospect because Tullio is really less of an "Einstein notation DSL" and more of a "general reduction notation DSL".
Open to suggestions for how to make it more clear, or where is best to put this in the README.