A few thoughts on design possibilities for this:

We need some sort of "pending trial configs" abstraction.
- A simple way to implement this I think would be to provide a small class that interfaces with the storage backend and looks up pending trial/configs based on their status.
  Scheduling queue: Allow submitting trials with future timestamps and use watermarks to retrieve configs and results #676 starts this work
  - Note that that would support the ability to inject new trial/configs manually, repeats (e.g., for noisy handling confidence), or to mix ensembles of different "suggestion" modes (e.g., SMAC, FLAML, LLM, etc.) since it can separate the optimization method from the trial/config scheduling (see below).
We need a notion of a "worker" (terminology to be determined).
- At a high level, this could be a forked child process that manages running one trial to completion and returning the results to the orchestrator (i.e., the optimization loop in run.py)
- top-level mlos_bench cli config will be needed to determine how many of these slots there should be active (e.g., max 10 parallel trials).
Trial configs would need to be able to make use of a new built in variable (e.g., $worker_instance_id) in order to template out VM names, for instance, so there are no overlaps between parallel trial instances.
We need to a "scheduler" component, that matches a pending trial/config to a worker.
- This should support pluggable policies so that when a worker becomes idle (returns a status from a finished execution) we can determine which of the pending trials to assign to it vs. generate a new suggestion
  - This might need additional configs like max pending trials or max suggestions or some such. See Also Implement more flexible "Stopping Conditions" #427 for relation to improved stopping conditions specifications.
- Additionally, for restart and error handling, we will need to store which worker_id was assigned which trial in the backend storage.
The run.py optimization loop will need to be adjusted so that the main process now acts purely as an orchestrator. Something like multiprocessing pool could work well for this.

Uh oh!

parallel trial execution #380

Description

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

Labels

Type

Fields

Projects

Milestone

Relationships

Development

Issue actions