Skip to content

Refactor code structure for better readability and maintainability#1418

Merged
danhellem merged 3 commits into
mainfrom
users/dahellem/consolidate-work-1
Jul 14, 2026
Merged

Refactor code structure for better readability and maintainability#1418
danhellem merged 3 commits into
mainfrom
users/dahellem/consolidate-work-1

Conversation

@danhellem

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

This pull request updates the tests for the configureWorkTools function to reflect recent changes in tool registration and handler invocation. The main focus is on consolidating tool names and ensuring the correct action parameters are passed in test cases.

Test suite alignment with new tool registration:

Parameterization improvements:

  • Added the appropriate action field (e.g., "list_team_iterations" or "list_iterations") to the parameters passed to tool handlers in all relevant test cases, ensuring that the handler receives the correct context for each action. [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10]

These changes keep the test suite in sync with the updated implementation and improve clarity and maintainability.

GitHub issue number

N/A

Associated Risks

Changing signatures of tools and consolidating. Starting with smaller toolsets to make sure this goes well.

PR Checklist

  • I have read the contribution guidelines
  • I have read the code of conduct guidelines
  • Title of the pull request is clear and informative.
  • 👌 Code hygiene
  • 🔭 Telemetry added, updated, or N/A
  • 📄 Documentation added, updated, or N/A
  • 🛡️ Automated tests added, or N/A

🧪 How did you test it?

Ran several manual tests. Updated the automated tests

@danhellem danhellem requested a review from a team as a code owner July 13, 2026 16:57
@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Dependency Review

✅ No vulnerabilities or license issues or OpenSSF Scorecard issues found.

Scanned Files

None

Comment thread docs/TOOLSET.md
Comment thread src/tools/work.ts
return { content: [{ type: "text", text: "No iterations were found" }], isError: true };
}
if (!team) {
return { content: [{ type: "text", text: "Team is required for get_team_capacity" }], isError: true };

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

NIT: Would be better if we could implement a singular function for required arguments that don't elicit. Need to check on the feasibility of this.

@danhellem danhellem merged commit 2714bf6 into main Jul 14, 2026
6 checks passed
@danhellem danhellem deleted the users/dahellem/consolidate-work-1 branch July 14, 2026 14:06
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants