Refactor code structure for better readability and maintainability#1418
Merged
Conversation
Dependency Review✅ No vulnerabilities or license issues or OpenSSF Scorecard issues found.Scanned FilesNone |
krid-583
reviewed
Jul 14, 2026
krid-583
reviewed
Jul 14, 2026
| return { content: [{ type: "text", text: "No iterations were found" }], isError: true }; | ||
| } | ||
| if (!team) { | ||
| return { content: [{ type: "text", text: "Team is required for get_team_capacity" }], isError: true }; |
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment.
NIT: Would be better if we could implement a singular function for required arguments that don't elicit. Need to check on the feasibility of this.
krid-583
approved these changes
Jul 14, 2026
dpaquette
approved these changes
Jul 14, 2026
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This pull request updates the tests for the
configureWorkToolsfunction to reflect recent changes in tool registration and handler invocation. The main focus is on consolidating tool names and ensuring the correct action parameters are passed in test cases.Test suite alignment with new tool registration:
"work"tool instead of the previous"work_list_team_iterations"and"work_list_iterations"tool names, ensuring consistency with the refactored tool registration logic. [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14] [15] [16] [17]Parameterization improvements:
actionfield (e.g.,"list_team_iterations"or"list_iterations") to the parameters passed to tool handlers in all relevant test cases, ensuring that the handler receives the correct context for each action. [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10]These changes keep the test suite in sync with the updated implementation and improve clarity and maintainability.
GitHub issue number
N/A
Associated Risks
Changing signatures of tools and consolidating. Starting with smaller toolsets to make sure this goes well.
✅ PR Checklist
🧪 How did you test it?
Ran several manual tests. Updated the automated tests