|
| 1 | +--- |
| 2 | +applyTo: ".github/workflows/**" |
| 3 | +description: ALWAYS review these instructions when reading or modifying PR check workflows, or any scripts referenced by the workflows. |
| 4 | +--- |
| 5 | + |
| 6 | +# PR Check Workflow Guidelines |
| 7 | + |
| 8 | +## Fork-PR-safe pattern: stub + reusable |
| 9 | + |
| 10 | +Problem: `pull_request` triggers on fork PRs run without secrets and with a read-only token. `pull_request_target` runs with write access but checks out the BASE ref by default — easy to footgun into RCE if you then check out PR code with full privileges. |
| 11 | + |
| 12 | +Pattern: |
| 13 | + |
| 14 | +1. **Stub workflow** on the default branch — triggered by `pull_request_target`, guards on repo owner, calls the reusable workflow. This is the only file GitHub will load from the base branch, so it locks the entrypoint. |
| 15 | +2. **Reusable workflow** (`workflow_call`) holds the real logic. Lives on the PR branch, so contributors can iterate on it. |
| 16 | +3. Stub passes `pull-requests: write` / `contents: read` only. Reusable declares its own minimum permissions. |
| 17 | + |
| 18 | +Never check out PR code into a privileged job and then execute it on the host. Either: |
| 19 | +- Run untrusted code inside a container with no secrets mounted, **or** |
| 20 | +- Keep the privileged job read-only (lint, comment-post) and isolate code execution to a separate unprivileged job. |
| 21 | + |
| 22 | +## Prefer in-container for anything that executes PR code |
| 23 | + |
| 24 | +If the check builds, renders, or runs PR code, do the whole thing inside the build container. Mock is a critical component of many azldev workflows. It requires many privileges to run successfully. It also is not available in Ubuntu, which is the default runner image for GitHub Actions. |
| 25 | + |
| 26 | +- Mount the PR checkout read-only when possible; if writes are needed (e.g. `git add -N`), mount rw but don't leak host paths or secrets. |
| 27 | +- Produce **all outputs** (reports, patches, diffs) inside the container and write them to a bind-mounted output dir. Host-side steps then only read these artifacts (json report, patch files, etc.) |
| 28 | +- This eliminates a huge class of config-driven git RCE vectors (`core.fsmonitor`, `core.sshCommand`, hook files, etc.) because the host never runs git against PR-controlled config. |
| 29 | + |
| 30 | +### Container config |
| 31 | + |
| 32 | +The shared runner image is [`.github/workflows/containers/azldev-runner.Dockerfile`](../workflows/containers/azldev-runner.Dockerfile). It's a minimal Azure Linux base with `mock`, `git`, `python3`, `sudo`, and `azldev` itself (installed to `/usr/local/bin` during image build) — enough to run any `azldev` subcommand. Reuse it rather than building a per-check image; add extras via a derived `FROM localhost/azldev-runner` stage if a check genuinely needs more. |
| 33 | + |
| 34 | +`azldev` is baked in via `go install …/azldev@main` during image build. The pin lives in the Dockerfile so it can be reviewed and bumped deliberately. Image build context is `.github/workflows/containers/` only — keep it that way so the build can never see PR-controlled files. |
| 35 | + |
| 36 | +Build it with the caller's UID so bind-mounted writes don't end up root-owned: |
| 37 | + |
| 38 | +```yaml |
| 39 | +- name: Build azldev runner |
| 40 | + run: | |
| 41 | + docker build \ |
| 42 | + --build-arg UID=$(id -u) \ |
| 43 | + -t localhost/azldev-runner \ |
| 44 | + -f .github/workflows/containers/azldev-runner.Dockerfile \ |
| 45 | + .github/workflows/containers/ |
| 46 | +``` |
| 47 | +
|
| 48 | +#### Bind-mount conventions |
| 49 | +
|
| 50 | +| Mount | Mode | Purpose | |
| 51 | +| ----- | ---- | ------- | |
| 52 | +| `pr-head/` → `/workdir` | rw | PR checkout. rw because `azldev` writes to `specs/`, `base/build/`, etc. | |
| 53 | +| `<host-output-dir>/` → `/output` | rw | Trusted-shape outputs (JSON reports, patches, ...) the container produces for the host to consume after the run. | |
| 54 | +| `.github/workflows/scripts/` → `/scripts` | ro | Helper scripts from the trusted base checkout. | |
| 55 | + |
| 56 | +#### Sandbox flags (minimum viable for `mock`) |
| 57 | + |
| 58 | +```yaml |
| 59 | +docker run --rm \ |
| 60 | + --cap-add=SYS_ADMIN \ |
| 61 | + --security-opt seccomp=unconfined \ |
| 62 | + --security-opt apparmor=unconfined \ |
| 63 | + ... |
| 64 | +``` |
| 65 | + |
| 66 | +Why each one is needed: |
| 67 | + |
| 68 | +- **`--cap-add=SYS_ADMIN`** — `mock` sets up mount namespaces for its chroot. Without this you get `mount … exit status 32` during chroot init. |
| 69 | +- **`--security-opt seccomp=unconfined`** — `mock` uses syscalls (`unshare`, `pivot_root`, etc.) that Docker's default seccomp profile blocks. |
| 70 | +- **`--security-opt apparmor=unconfined`** — `ubuntu-latest` ships the `docker-default` AppArmor profile, which blocks `mount -t tmpfs` on paths under `/var/lib/mock` **even with `SYS_ADMIN` granted**. This is the confusing one; symptom is the same `exit status 32` after seccomp is already unconfined. |
| 71 | + |
| 72 | +Avoid `--privileged` — it grants every capability and removes cgroup restrictions, which is a much bigger blast radius than the three flags above. |
| 73 | + |
| 74 | +`--security-opt no-new-privileges` would be nice but `mock`'s `userhelper` needs setuid, which that flag blocks. |
| 75 | + |
| 76 | +#### Running commands in the container |
| 77 | + |
| 78 | +Use `bash -eu -o pipefail -c '…'` as the entrypoint invocation so a failure inside the heredoc actually fails the step: |
| 79 | + |
| 80 | +```yaml |
| 81 | +localhost/azldev-runner \ |
| 82 | + bash -eu -o pipefail -c ' |
| 83 | + azldev component render -q -a --clean-stale -O json > /output/render.json |
| 84 | + python3 /scripts/check_rendered_specs.py \ |
| 85 | + --specs-dir "$(azldev config dump -q -f json | jq -r .project.renderedSpecsDir)" \ |
| 86 | + --report /output/report.json \ |
| 87 | + --patch /output/rendered-specs.patch |
| 88 | + ' |
| 89 | +``` |
| 90 | + |
| 91 | +Use single-quotes around the `-c` payload so host-side `${{ … }}` interpolation doesn't leak into the container script. If you need to pass a host value in, use `-e VAR=…` and reference `"$VAR"` inside — same script-injection concern as any other shell step. |
| 92 | + |
| 93 | +## Shell hardening in workflow steps |
| 94 | + |
| 95 | +- Start every multi-line `run:` with `set -euo pipefail`. |
| 96 | +- Quote **every** expansion involving a workflow input, matrix value, or file path: `"${VAR}"`, not `$VAR`. |
| 97 | +- Never interpolate `${{ github.event.pull_request.* }}` directly into a shell script — assign to an `env:` var first, then reference as `"$VAR"`. Direct interpolation is a classic script-injection vector. |
| 98 | +- For paths that must stay inside the repo, resolve with `realpath -m` and verify they start with the repo root prefix before use. |
| 99 | + |
| 100 | +## Markdown / HTML injection in PR comments |
| 101 | + |
| 102 | +- Escape any PR-controlled string (file paths, error messages) before dropping into Markdown. |
| 103 | +- Prefer code spans (`` `path` ``) or fenced blocks for anything path-like. |
| 104 | + |
| 105 | +## zizmor / pedantic linting |
| 106 | + |
| 107 | +Workflows are linted with `zizmor --pedantic`. |
| 108 | + |
| 109 | +Use `# zizmor: ignore[<rule>]` comments as an absolute last resort, and provide a comprehensive justification for why the rule is being ignored. |
0 commit comments