Add the option to export data URIs to files.#1307
Open
mike-matera wants to merge 5 commits into
Open
Conversation
Author
|
@microsoft-github-policy-service agree |
|
Exactly what I needed! Thanks @mike-matera |
|
Does it work for pdf as well ? |
|
need it, i want to know when it would be published |
Jeandoom
reviewed
Nov 4, 2025
Jeandoom
left a comment
Jeandoom
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
please merge this into main branch and quickly publish it
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
4 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Hello!
This pull request builds on #1140 by adding an option,
--export-data-uris, that allows users to specify a path prefix where embedded images will be saved. The document will be generated with references to the saved files. The rationale is to make it so converted documents are easier to edit because they don't contain mountains of base64 encoded data.I realize this might not quite be in line with the goal of making the data available to an LLM but it really seems like a missing feature.
Please let me know what you think.