Fix GetRootSymbols missing return#923
Merged
jakebailey merged 1 commit intomainfrom May 23, 2025
Merged
Conversation
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Pull Request Overview
This PR fixes a missing early return in GetRootSymbols, ensuring that once root symbols are collected recursively, the result is immediately returned instead of falling through to the default case.
- Added
return resultinside the recursion branch ofGetRootSymbols
Comments suppressed due to low confidence (1)
internal/checker/services.go:344
- Add unit tests for
GetRootSymbolscovering cases where symbols have multiple levels of roots to ensure the new return path produces the correct flattened list.
return result
gabritto
approved these changes
May 23, 2025
Member
gabritto
left a comment
gabritto
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Oops! Thanks for fixing this.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Found in #717.