C# server emitter union failures#10999
Merged
Merged
Conversation
commit: |
Contributor
|
All changed packages have been documented.
Show changes
|
|
You can try these changes here
|
…msey/csharp-server-union-failure
sophia-ramsey
force-pushed
the
sramsey/csharp-server-union-failure
branch
from
a02b4f4 to
a444737
Compare
sophia-ramsey
force-pushed
the
sramsey/csharp-server-union-failure
branch
from
a444737 to
496e67b
Compare
sophia-ramsey
changed the title
sophia-ramsey
requested review from
bterlson,
catalinaperalta,
iscai-msft,
markcowl,
timotheeguerin and
witemple-msft
as code owners
…msey/csharp-server-union-failure
timotheeguerin
approved these changes
Jun 19, 2026
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
I have identified some issues with the C# server emitter that result in files for unions not being emitted. I found this issues when emitting from this spec: ReasoningEffort in openai-openapi-pr
Failing scenarios:
"none", "minimal", "low",instead ofnone: "none", minimal: "minimal", low: "low")Passing scenarios: