Skip to content

Support highlighter#1745

Merged
sre-ci-robot merged 1 commit intomilvus-io:masterfrom
yhmo:mm
Jan 20, 2026
Merged

Support highlighter#1745
sre-ci-robot merged 1 commit intomilvus-io:masterfrom
yhmo:mm

Conversation

@yhmo
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@yhmo yhmo commented Jan 20, 2026

No description provided.

@sre-ci-robot
Copy link
Copy Markdown

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: yhmo

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Details Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@gemini-code-assist
Copy link
Copy Markdown

Summary of Changes

Hello @yhmo, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request integrates a new "highlighter" feature into the Milvus SDK, enabling users to receive highlighted text fragments within their search results. It introduces a flexible API for configuring both lexical and semantic highlighting, enhancing the search experience by providing more contextually relevant information directly in the response. The changes span across request and response models, as well as internal conversion utilities, to support this new functionality.

Highlights

  • Highlighter API Introduction: New Highlighter interface and concrete implementations (LexicalHighlighter, SemanticHighlighter) are added to define highlighting configurations for search requests.
  • Search Request Enhancement: The SearchReq class now includes a highlighter field, allowing users to specify highlighting preferences when performing searches.
  • Search Response Enrichment: SearchResp.SearchResult is extended with a highlightResults map, and a new HighlightResult class is introduced to encapsulate highlighted fragments and their scores.
  • Internal Utility Updates: ConvertUtils and VectorUtils are modified to correctly serialize highlighter configurations for gRPC requests and deserialize highlight results from gRPC responses into the SDK's new data structures.
  • Milvus Proto Update: The milvus-proto subproject commit was updated, likely to include the necessary gRPC definitions for the new highlighter feature.

🧠 New Feature in Public Preview: You can now enable Memory to help Gemini Code Assist learn from your team's feedback. This makes future code reviews more consistent and personalized to your project's style. Click here to enable Memory in your admin console.

Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

@mergify mergify Bot added the dco-passed label Jan 20, 2026
Copy link
Copy Markdown

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist Bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request introduces support for the highlighter feature in search requests, a valuable addition for improving search result interpretability. The implementation includes a new Highlighter interface with LexicalHighlighter and SemanticHighlighter implementations, and updates to SearchReq and SearchResp to integrate this feature. The code is well-structured and follows existing design patterns. My review includes suggestions to fix a typo for better maintainability, remove some redundant code, and address a potential integer overflow issue that could affect correctness under certain conditions.

Comment thread sdk-core/src/main/java/io/milvus/v2/utils/ConvertUtils.java
Comment thread sdk-core/src/main/java/io/milvus/v2/service/vector/response/SearchResp.java Outdated
@mergify mergify Bot added the ci-passed label Jan 20, 2026
Signed-off-by: yhmo <yihua.mo@zilliz.com>
@yhmo yhmo added the lgtm label Jan 20, 2026
@sre-ci-robot sre-ci-robot merged commit 052cea4 into milvus-io:master Jan 20, 2026
5 checks passed
@yhmo yhmo deleted the mm branch January 20, 2026 10:39
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants