add fields to program summary report to allow for additional filtering of the report

[KatelynGit]

What are the relevant tickets?

https://github.mit.edu/MIT-OL-Data-Platform/Data-Platform-Issues/issues/4

Description (What does it do?)

adds platform, program_type, program_track, and program_readable_id fields to the program_summary_report

How can this be tested?

dbt build --select program_summary_report

[rachellougee]

Sorry, I didn't get to it last week. The dbt run successfully. However, when I check the data, the program_type, program_track and program_readable_id are all NULL for edX.org, which doesn't seem correct.

The initial design for program_summary_report was to group all the variants into one (see the original issue - To keep the summary simple, we will summarize all these variants as one program). This is why the program_track was not included in the report. @pdpinch is this requirement changed?

However, the current logic appears to be grouping by both program_readable_id, program_type and program_track, which should create separate rows for each variant. That is fine as long as the grouping is intentional, but for the program Statistics and Data Science, the summary should not be a single row now because it has 4 variants (4 program tracks). Here is the dashboard for "Statistics and Data Science" in https://bi.ol.mit.edu/superset/dashboard/p/ed9qrbjqxan/ for comparison.

@KatelynGit Can you please take a look?

[KatelynGit]

Sorry, I didn't get to it last week. The dbt run successfully. However, when I check the data, the program_type, program_track and program_readable_id are all NULL for edX.org, which doesn't seem correct.

The initial design for program_summary_report was to group all the variants into one (see the original issue - To keep the summary simple, we will summarize all these variants as one program). This is why the program_track was not included in the report. @pdpinch is this requirement changed?

However, the current logic appears to be grouping by both program_readable_id, program_type and program_track, which should create separate rows for each variant. That is fine as long as the grouping is intentional, but for the program Statistics and Data Science, the summary should not be a single row now because it has 4 variants (4 program tracks). Here is the dashboard for "Statistics and Data Science" in https://bi.ol.mit.edu/superset/dashboard/p/ed9qrbjqxan/ for comparison.

@KatelynGit Can you please take a look?

Thanks for taking a look Rachel. I'll look into it. Just to give background- the reason for this request was really driven by Jeremy Rossen and others looking as SDS program data and were trying to use the filters on the left hand side of the dashboard here- https://bi.ol.mit.edu/superset/dashboard/p/vmQq1YwqAdJ/ they noticed the filters weren't working for the summary tab and needed them to answer some of their questions.

[rachellougee]

Just to give background- the reason for this request was really driven by Jeremy Rossen and others looking as SDS program data and were trying to use the filters on the left hand side of the dashboard here- https://bi.ol.mit.edu/superset/dashboard/p/vmQq1YwqAdJ/ they noticed the filters weren't working for the summary tab and needed them to answer some of their questions.

Good to know. https://github.com/mitodl/hq/issues/6124#issuecomment-2546322904 - this is where we left when Peter noticed the same thing, so I can understand the confusion - it wasn't designed to filter by program type, only by name.

[shaidar]

@KatelynGit is this still relevant?

[KatelynGit]

@KatelynGit is this still relevant?

It would still be a good change i think- but not urgent