Skip to content

test(NODE-7508): Fix inconsistent wording for prose retryable writes test 6, case 3#4913

Merged
tadjik1 merged 7 commits intomainfrom
NODE-7508
Apr 8, 2026
Merged

test(NODE-7508): Fix inconsistent wording for prose retryable writes test 6, case 3#4913
tadjik1 merged 7 commits intomainfrom
NODE-7508

Conversation

@PavelSafronov
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Description

Summary of Changes

Notes for Reviewers

What is the motivation for this change?

Release Highlight

Release notes highlight

Double check the following

  • Lint is passing (npm run check:lint)
  • Self-review completed using the steps outlined here
  • PR title follows the correct format: type(NODE-xxxx)[!]: description
    • Example: feat(NODE-1234)!: rewriting everything in coffeescript
  • Changes are covered by tests
  • New TODOs have a related JIRA ticket

@PavelSafronov PavelSafronov marked this pull request as ready for review April 7, 2026 22:07
@PavelSafronov PavelSafronov requested a review from a team as a code owner April 7, 2026 22:07
Copilot AI review requested due to automatic review settings April 7, 2026 22:07
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview

This PR updates the prose comments for Retryable Writes spec test 6, case 3 to use consistent and correct wording for the described failpoint/error-label sequence.

Changes:

  • Corrects the wording around error code 91 (ShutdownInProgress) vs prior inconsistent phrasing.
  • Clarifies the intended ordering of failpoint behavior: first error without NoWritesPerformed, subsequent errors with NoWritesPerformed.
  • Updates the embedded failpoint examples (mode and errorLabels) to match the described scenario.

💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@tadjik1 tadjik1 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks @PavelSafronov!

I will merge PR once CI is complete.

@tadjik1 tadjik1 self-assigned this Apr 8, 2026
@tadjik1 tadjik1 added the Primary Review In Review with primary reviewer, not yet ready for team's eyes label Apr 8, 2026
@tadjik1 tadjik1 merged commit 1cf791f into main Apr 8, 2026
30 of 36 checks passed
@tadjik1 tadjik1 deleted the NODE-7508 branch April 8, 2026 14:57
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Primary Review In Review with primary reviewer, not yet ready for team's eyes

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants