Commit ea1df89
committed
fix(distributed): preserve UI-added node labels across worker re-register
The register endpoint called SetNodeLabels(req.Labels) — replace-all
semantics — so every worker re-register wiped every label not in the
worker's body. The bug existed since labels were introduced in
PR #9186 (Mar 31), but only triggered for workers that supplied
labels via --node-labels.
PR #9583 (the multi-replica refactor) added an auto-mirrored
`node.replica-slots` label to every worker's registration body, which
made `len(req.Labels) > 0` always true — turning a latent edge-case
bug into a universal one. Operators reported "labels assigned to
node do not persist": labels survived until the next worker restart,
then disappeared.
Fix: iterate req.Labels and call SetNodeLabel (upsert) for each
instead of SetNodeLabels (delete-then-recreate). Worker-managed
labels still refresh on re-register; UI-added labels survive.
Trade-off: an operator who removes a label from --node-labels won't
have it auto-removed from the DB on next register — they can clean it
via the UI. Acceptable, since the alternative (current behavior)
silently destroys operator state.
Regression test added first (TDD): RegisterNodeEndpoint registers a
node, the test simulates a UI add via SetNodeLabel, then re-registers
with a different worker label set; assertion that the UI-added label
survives. Test fails against the broken code, passes against the fix.
Signed-off-by: Ettore Di Giacinto <mudler@localai.io>
Assisted-by: claude-code:opus-4-7 [Edit] [Bash]1 parent 3280b9a commit ea1df89
2 files changed
Lines changed: 58 additions & 4 deletions
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change | |
|---|---|---|---|
| |||
163 | 163 | | |
164 | 164 | | |
165 | 165 | | |
166 | | - | |
167 | | - | |
168 | | - | |
169 | | - | |
| 166 | + | |
| 167 | + | |
| 168 | + | |
| 169 | + | |
| 170 | + | |
| 171 | + | |
| 172 | + | |
| 173 | + | |
| 174 | + | |
| 175 | + | |
170 | 176 | | |
171 | 177 | | |
172 | 178 | | |
| |||
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change | |
|---|---|---|---|
| |||
180 | 180 | | |
181 | 181 | | |
182 | 182 | | |
| 183 | + | |
| 184 | + | |
| 185 | + | |
| 186 | + | |
| 187 | + | |
| 188 | + | |
| 189 | + | |
| 190 | + | |
| 191 | + | |
| 192 | + | |
| 193 | + | |
| 194 | + | |
| 195 | + | |
| 196 | + | |
| 197 | + | |
| 198 | + | |
| 199 | + | |
| 200 | + | |
| 201 | + | |
| 202 | + | |
| 203 | + | |
| 204 | + | |
| 205 | + | |
| 206 | + | |
| 207 | + | |
| 208 | + | |
| 209 | + | |
| 210 | + | |
| 211 | + | |
| 212 | + | |
| 213 | + | |
| 214 | + | |
| 215 | + | |
| 216 | + | |
| 217 | + | |
| 218 | + | |
| 219 | + | |
| 220 | + | |
| 221 | + | |
| 222 | + | |
| 223 | + | |
| 224 | + | |
| 225 | + | |
| 226 | + | |
| 227 | + | |
| 228 | + | |
| 229 | + | |
| 230 | + | |
183 | 231 | | |
184 | 232 | | |
185 | 233 | | |
| |||
0 commit comments