Commit fda1c55
authored
fix(distributed): stop queue loops on agent nodes + dead-letter cap (#9433)
pending_backend_ops rows targeting agent-type workers looped forever:
the reconciler fan-out hit a NATS subject the worker doesn't subscribe
to, returned ErrNoResponders, we marked the node unhealthy, and the
health monitor flipped it back to healthy on the next heartbeat. Next
tick, same row, same failure.
Three related fixes:
1. enqueueAndDrainBackendOp skips nodes whose NodeType != backend.
Agent workers handle agent NATS subjects, not backend.install /
delete / list, so enqueueing for them guarantees an infinite retry
loop. Silent skip is correct — they aren't consumers of these ops.
2. Reconciler drain mirrors enqueueAndDrainBackendOp's behavior on
nats.ErrNoResponders: mark the node unhealthy before recording the
failure, so subsequent ListDuePendingBackendOps (filters by
status=healthy) stops picking the row until the node actually
recovers. Matches the synchronous fan-out path.
3. Dead-letter cap at maxPendingBackendOpAttempts (10). After ~1h of
exponential backoff the row is a poison message; further retries
just thrash NATS. Row is deleted and logged at ERROR so it stays
visible without staying infinite.
Plus a one-shot startup cleanup in NewNodeRegistry: drop queue rows
that target agent-type nodes, non-existent nodes, or carry an empty
backend name. Guarded by the same schema-migration advisory lock so
only one instance performs it. The guards above prevent new rows of
this shape; this closes the migration gap for existing ones.
Tests: the prune migration (valid row stays, agent + empty-name rows
drop) on top of existing upsert / backoff coverage.1 parent b27de08 commit fda1c55
4 files changed
Lines changed: 94 additions & 0 deletions
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change | |
|---|---|---|---|
| |||
106 | 106 | | |
107 | 107 | | |
108 | 108 | | |
| 109 | + | |
| 110 | + | |
| 111 | + | |
| 112 | + | |
| 113 | + | |
| 114 | + | |
| 115 | + | |
109 | 116 | | |
110 | 117 | | |
111 | 118 | | |
| |||
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change | |
|---|---|---|---|
| |||
3 | 3 | | |
4 | 4 | | |
5 | 5 | | |
| 6 | + | |
6 | 7 | | |
7 | 8 | | |
8 | 9 | | |
9 | 10 | | |
10 | 11 | | |
11 | 12 | | |
| 13 | + | |
12 | 14 | | |
13 | 15 | | |
14 | 16 | | |
| |||
206 | 208 | | |
207 | 209 | | |
208 | 210 | | |
| 211 | + | |
| 212 | + | |
| 213 | + | |
| 214 | + | |
| 215 | + | |
| 216 | + | |
| 217 | + | |
| 218 | + | |
| 219 | + | |
| 220 | + | |
| 221 | + | |
| 222 | + | |
| 223 | + | |
| 224 | + | |
| 225 | + | |
| 226 | + | |
| 227 | + | |
| 228 | + | |
| 229 | + | |
| 230 | + | |
| 231 | + | |
| 232 | + | |
| 233 | + | |
| 234 | + | |
| 235 | + | |
| 236 | + | |
| 237 | + | |
209 | 238 | | |
210 | 239 | | |
211 | 240 | | |
212 | 241 | | |
213 | 242 | | |
214 | 243 | | |
| 244 | + | |
| 245 | + | |
| 246 | + | |
| 247 | + | |
| 248 | + | |
| 249 | + | |
| 250 | + | |
| 251 | + | |
215 | 252 | | |
216 | 253 | | |
217 | 254 | | |
| |||
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change | |
|---|---|---|---|
| |||
373 | 373 | | |
374 | 374 | | |
375 | 375 | | |
| 376 | + | |
| 377 | + | |
| 378 | + | |
| 379 | + | |
| 380 | + | |
| 381 | + | |
| 382 | + | |
| 383 | + | |
| 384 | + | |
| 385 | + | |
| 386 | + | |
| 387 | + | |
| 388 | + | |
| 389 | + | |
| 390 | + | |
| 391 | + | |
| 392 | + | |
| 393 | + | |
| 394 | + | |
| 395 | + | |
| 396 | + | |
| 397 | + | |
| 398 | + | |
| 399 | + | |
| 400 | + | |
| 401 | + | |
376 | 402 | | |
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change | |
|---|---|---|---|
| |||
148 | 148 | | |
149 | 149 | | |
150 | 150 | | |
| 151 | + | |
| 152 | + | |
| 153 | + | |
| 154 | + | |
| 155 | + | |
| 156 | + | |
| 157 | + | |
| 158 | + | |
| 159 | + | |
| 160 | + | |
| 161 | + | |
| 162 | + | |
| 163 | + | |
| 164 | + | |
| 165 | + | |
| 166 | + | |
| 167 | + | |
| 168 | + | |
| 169 | + | |
| 170 | + | |
| 171 | + | |
| 172 | + | |
| 173 | + | |
| 174 | + | |
151 | 175 | | |
152 | 176 | | |
153 | 177 | | |
| |||
0 commit comments