Skip to content

multi proof pool#7912

Merged
AdoAdoAdo merged 4 commits into
recon-by-metafrom
multi-proof-storage
Jul 20, 2026
Merged

multi proof pool#7912
AdoAdoAdo merged 4 commits into
recon-by-metafrom
multi-proof-storage

Conversation

@AdoAdoAdo

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Reasoning behind the pull request

Proposed changes

Testing procedure

Pre-requisites

Based on the Contributing Guidelines the PR author and the reviewers must check the following requirements are met:

  • was the PR targeted to the correct branch?
  • if this is a larger feature that probably needs more than one PR, is there a feat branch created?
  • if this is a feat branch merging, do all satellite projects have a proper tag inside go.mod?

@codecov

codecov Bot commented Jul 13, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 94.50980% with 14 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
✅ Project coverage is 77.78%. Comparing base (72468d8) to head (062a592).

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
process/track/contendedHeadersProofPuller.go 90.90% 4 Missing and 4 partials ⚠️
dataRetriever/dataPool/proofsCache/proofsCache.go 96.29% 2 Missing and 1 partial ⚠️
factory/processing/processComponents.go 25.00% 2 Missing and 1 partial ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@                  Coverage Diff                   @@
##           feat/testnet-fixes    #7912      +/-   ##
======================================================
+ Coverage               77.74%   77.78%   +0.03%     
======================================================
  Files                     887      888       +1     
  Lines                  126451   126652     +201     
======================================================
+ Hits                    98309    98512     +203     
+ Misses                  21644    21638       -6     
- Partials                 6498     6502       +4     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Harness.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

continue
}

log.Debug("pulling proofs for contended head",

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

rename to use header ?

backoffRounds int64
}

type headCandidate struct {

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

what is the meaning of head here? the highest nonce? or it's just for header

@AdoAdoAdo
AdoAdoAdo changed the base branch from feat/testnet-fixes to feat/recon-by-meta July 20, 2026 07:33
@AdoAdoAdo
AdoAdoAdo marked this pull request as ready for review July 20, 2026 07:33
@AdoAdoAdo
AdoAdoAdo changed the base branch from feat/recon-by-meta to recon-by-meta July 20, 2026 07:35
@AdoAdoAdo
AdoAdoAdo merged commit 543306c into recon-by-meta Jul 20, 2026
7 of 9 checks passed
@AdoAdoAdo
AdoAdoAdo deleted the multi-proof-storage branch July 20, 2026 07:35
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants