Skip to content

Commit 17e49c0

Browse files
Евгений БлиновЕвгений Блинов
authored andcommitted
Fix thread identification wording in warning note
1 parent 43038c7 commit 17e49c0

1 file changed

Lines changed: 1 addition & 1 deletion

File tree

README.md

Lines changed: 1 addition & 1 deletion
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -219,4 +219,4 @@ If the `notify` method was called with the same parameter only when the lock act
219219

220220
How does it work? A modified [algorithm for determining the correct parenthesis sequence](https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%9F%D1%80%D0%B0%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%BB%D1%8C%D0%BD%D0%B0%D1%8F_%D1%81%D0%BA%D0%BE%D0%B1%D0%BE%D1%87%D0%BD%D0%B0%D1%8F_%D0%BF%D0%BE%D1%81%D0%BB%D0%B5%D0%B4%D0%BE%D0%B2%D0%B0%D1%82%D0%B5%D0%BB%D1%8C%D0%BD%D0%BE%D1%81%D1%82%D1%8C) is used here. For each thread for which any events were registered (taking the mutex, releasing the mutex, and also calling the `notify` method), the check takes place separately, that is, we determine that it was the same thread that held the mutex when `notify` was called, and not some other one.
221221

222-
> ⚠️ The thread id is used to identify the streams. This id may be reused if the current thread ends, which in some cases may lead to incorrect identification of lock coverage for operations that were not actually covered by the lock. Make sure that this cannot happen during your test.
222+
> ⚠️ The thread id is used to identify the threads. This id may be reused if the current thread ends, which in some cases may lead to incorrect identification of lock coverage for operations that were not actually covered by the lock. Make sure that this cannot happen during your test.

0 commit comments

Comments
 (0)