Thank you for improving this project! We value small, precise changes that solve real problems. We value incremental, detail‑first contributions over big rewrites or abstractions.
"Nobody should start to undertake a large project. You start with a small trivial project, and you should never expect it to get large. If you do, you'll just overdesign and generally think it is more important than it likely is at that stage. Or worse, you might be scared away by the sheer size of the work you envision. So start small, and think about the details. Don't think about some big picture and fancy design. If it doesn't solve some fairly immediate need, it's almost certainly over-designed. And don't expect people to jump in and help you. That's not how these things work. You need to get something half-way useful first, and then others will say "hey, that almost works for me", and they'll get involved in the project." — Linus Torvalds
-
Conventional Commits Follow https://www.conventionalcommits.org/en/v1.0.0/:
feat:for new featuresfix:for bug fixeschore:for maintenance or toolingdocs:for documentation changestest:for test additions or correctionsrefactor:for code changes that neither fix a bug nor add a featureci:for CI/CD pipeline changesperf:for performance improvements
-
Logical Commits Group changes by purpose. Multiple commits are fine, but avoid noise. Squash when appropriate.
-
Python Formatting & Style
- Use Black for consistent code formatting.
- Black is opinionated: don't argue with it, just run it.
- Line length is set to 88, matching the default.
- Use flake8 for static checks.
- Line length also set to 88.
- Some flake8 warnings are disabled (e.g.
E203,W503) to avoid conflicts with Black.
- Run
uv run black .anduv run flake8 .before submitting. - Use Python 3.13.x for local testing and formatting.
- Use Black for consistent code formatting.
-
Testing
- Run
pytestbefore pushing. - Ensure coverage isn’t regressing.
- Run
Significant architectural decisions are documented as ADRs in
docs/adr/. Before changing or replacing a decision captured in an
ADR, write a new ADR that supersedes it — do not edit the original.
When to write an ADR: apply the three-part test:
- A real fork existed — a genuine alternative was considered and rejected.
- The code doesn't explain the why — a new contributor reading the source cannot infer the reasoning.
- Revisiting it would be costly — changing it requires significant rework.
All three must be true. Process conventions (commit format, branch naming) and project principles (audience, tone) do not belong in ADRs.
ADRs are append-only. To change a decision: write a new ADR with
status SUPERSEDED by ADR-NNNN on the old one.
- One logical change per PR.
- Rebase or squash before opening to keep history clean.
- Title & Description
- Use Conventional Commit format.
- Explain what and why concisely in the PR body.
- Search open issues before creating a new one.
- Include clear steps to reproduce and environment details.
- Prefer focused issues—don’t bundle multiple topics.
All PRs and pushes go through CI:
- Commitlint for commit style
- Black for formatting
- flake8 for static checks
- pytest with coverage
PRs must pass all checks to be reviewed.
- See
CODE_OF_CONDUCT.mdfor guidelines and reporting. - For questions or planning, open an issue and use the
discussionlabel, or mention a maintainer.
Thanks again for helping keep this project small, sharp, and focused.