Updated alignment numbers for new vg giraffe

Author: joannmudge

html/flashcard_bam.html

@@ -8149,11 +8149,11 @@
 
     {   
         "front": "How many reads aligned to the S288C path?",
-        "back": "1,557,161 reads aligned to the S288C path. This is approximately 7% of the reads, a lower percentage than aligned to the chrVIII graph. This is likely because we have lost SK1 reads that aligned to SK1 or Y12."
+        "back": "1,557,221 reads aligned to the S288C path. This is approximately 7.1% of the reads, a lower percentage than aligned to the chrVIII graph. This is likely because we have lost SK1 reads that aligned to SK1 or Y12."
     },
     {
         "front": "How many reads were properly paired when they were aligned (the read and its pair were aligned in the expected order and orientation)?",
-        "back": "1,437,624 reads were aligned and properly paired (92.3% of aligned reads).<br><br>The statistics list the percentage of properly paired reads as 6.6%. They are dividing the number aligned and properly paired reads by the total number of reads. But because we only aligned to chrVIII and the reads are from all chromosomes, we expect that most of the reads will not align and the overall percentage will be predictably low."
+        "back": "1,437,428 reads were aligned and properly paired (92.3% of aligned reads).<br><br>The statistics list the percentage of properly paired reads as 6.6%. They are dividing the number aligned and properly paired reads by the total number of reads. But because we only aligned to chrVIII and the reads are from all chromosomes, we expect that most of the reads will not align and the overall percentage will be predictably low."
     }
 ];
 var frontColorsoRUeOzRhNyQd= ["var(--asparagus)", "var(--terra-cotta)", "var(--cyan-process)" ];